Sakreida Katrin, Blume-Schnitzler Johanna, Frankemölle Grit, Drews Vanessa, Heim Stefan, Willmes Klaus, Clusmann Hans, Neuloh Georg
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2020 Mar;81(2):130-137. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701236. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
Language mapping by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is commonly applied over the left language-dominant hemisphere to indicate the language-related cortex. Detailed language mapping of Broca's region including stimulation targets in the immediate vicinity to the premotor cortex may raise concern about confounding unspecific motor effects. We performed interhemispheric comparisons to delineate such possible unspecific effects from true TMS-induced language inhibition.
Fifteen healthy German speakers named object pictures during navigated TMS over a left- and right-hemispheric target array covering the left inferior frontal junction area. Six mapping repetitions were conducted per hemisphere. Order of stimulation side was randomized between participants. Self-rating of discomfort was assessed after each stimulation; language errors and motor side effects were evaluated offline.
Naming errors were observed significantly more frequently during left- than right-hemispheric stimulation. The same pattern was found for the most frequent error category of performance errors. Hierarchical cluster analyses of normalized ratings of error severity revealed a clear focus of TMS susceptibility for language inhibition in object naming at the dorsoposterior target sites only in the left hemisphere. We found no statistical difference in discomfort ratings between both hemispheres and also no interhemispheric difference in motor side effects, but we observed significantly stronger muscle contractions of the eyes as compared with the mouth.
Our results of (1) unspecific pre-/motor effects similarly induced in both hemispheres, and (2) a specific focus of TMS susceptibility in the language-dominant hemisphere render any substantial contribution of nonlanguage-specific effects in TMS language mapping of the inferior frontal junction area highly unlikely.
通过导航经颅磁刺激(TMS)进行语言映射通常应用于左侧语言优势半球,以指示与语言相关的皮层。对布洛卡区进行详细的语言映射,包括紧邻运动前皮层的刺激靶点,可能会引发对混淆非特异性运动效应的担忧。我们进行了半球间比较,以区分真正的TMS诱导的语言抑制与可能的非特异性效应。
15名健康的德语使用者在覆盖左侧额下交界区的左、右半球目标阵列上进行导航TMS时命名物体图片。每个半球进行6次映射重复。刺激侧的顺序在参与者之间随机分配。每次刺激后评估不适的自我评分;离线评估语言错误和运动副作用。
在左侧半球刺激期间观察到的命名错误明显比右侧半球更频繁。在最常见的表现错误类别中也发现了相同的模式。对错误严重程度的标准化评分进行层次聚类分析,结果显示仅在左侧半球的背侧后靶点部位,TMS对物体命名中的语言抑制具有明显的易感性焦点。我们发现两个半球之间的不适评分没有统计学差异,运动副作用也没有半球间差异,但与嘴部相比,我们观察到眼部肌肉收缩明显更强。
我们的结果(1)两个半球均类似地诱导出非特异性的前运动/运动效应,以及(2)在语言优势半球中TMS易感性的特定焦点,使得非语言特异性效应在额下交界区TMS语言映射中的任何实质性贡献极不可能。