• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using Democratic Deliberation to Engage Veterans in Complex Policy Making for the Veterans Health Administration.利用民主审议让退伍军人参与退伍军人健康管理局的复杂政策制定。
Fed Pract. 2020 Jan;37(1):24-32.
2
Military veteran engagement with mental health and well-being services: a qualitative study of the role of the peer support worker.退伍军人与心理健康和福祉服务的互动：同伴支持工作者角色的定性研究。
J Ment Health. 2019 Dec;28(6):647-653. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1370640. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
The Ethical Imperative And Moral Challenges Of Engaging Patients And The Public With Evidence.让患者和公众参与循证实践的伦理要求与道德挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):583-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1392.
4
Staff Perceptions of Key Factors Guiding Nursing Home Search and Selection Within the Veterans Health Administration.员工对退伍军人健康管理局内养老院搜索和选择的关键因素的看法。
Gerontologist. 2018 Jul 13;58(4):e226-e238. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx096.
5
Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.哪些公众以及为何是刻意选择的？——对公共卫生与卫生政策研究中公众参与审议的范围界定审查
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;131:114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
6
Substance in bureaucratic procedures for healthcare resource allocation: a reply to Smith.官僚程序中的医疗资源分配实质：对史密斯的回应。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Jan;45(1):75-76. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104932. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
7
The Veterans Choice Act: A Qualitative Examination of Rapid Policy Implementation in the Department of Veterans Affairs.《退伍军人选择法案》：对退伍军人事务部快速政策实施的定性研究
Med Care. 2017 Jul;55 Suppl 7 Suppl 1:S71-S75. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000667.
8
My military: a navy nurse practitioner's perspective on military culture and joining forces for veteran health.我的军旅生涯：一名海军执业护士对军事文化及为退伍军人健康携手合作的看法。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2013 Feb;25(2):77-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00810.x. Epub 2012 Dec 2.
9
Faith-Based Organizations and Veteran Reintegration: Enriching the Web of Support.基于信仰的组织与退伍军人重新融入社会：丰富支持网络。
Rand Health Q. 2015 Nov 30;5(2):15.
10
The United States Veterans Administration health care system as a model of regionalization.
J Med Syst. 1981;5(1-2):111-27. doi: 10.1007/BF02222065.

引用本文的文献

1
Public deliberation to assess patient views on biosimilar medication switching for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.公众协商评估炎症性肠病患者对生物类似药转换治疗的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):1209. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11570-3.
2
The Need for Brevity During Shared Decision Making (SDM) for Cancer Screening: Veterans' Perspectives on an "Everyday SDM" Compromise.癌症筛查共同决策（SDM）过程中对简洁性的需求：退伍军人对“日常SDM”折衷方案的看法。
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Oct 26;6(2):23814683211055120. doi: 10.1177/23814683211055120. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Dual Use of Department of Veterans Affairs and Medicare Part D Drug Benefits and Potentially Unsafe Prescribing.退伍军人事务部和医疗保险D部分药品福利的双重使用与潜在不安全处方之间的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Nov 1;179(11):1584-1586. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2788.
2
The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation.民主危机与审议科学。
Science. 2019 Mar 15;363(6432):1144-1146. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2694.
3
Dual Receipt of Prescription Opioids From the Department of Veterans Affairs and Medicare Part D and Prescription Opioid Overdose Death Among Veterans: A Nested Case-Control Study.退伍军人事务部和医疗保险部分 D 双重开具处方阿片类药物和退伍军人处方阿片类药物过量死亡：嵌套病例对照研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Apr 2;170(7):433-442. doi: 10.7326/M18-2574. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
4
Care Fragmentation and Prescription Opioids.医疗碎片化与处方类阿片药物
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Apr 2;170(7):497-498. doi: 10.7326/M19-0492. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
5
Comparison of Wait Times for New Patients Between the Private Sector and United States Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.私营部门和美国退伍军人事务医疗中心新患者等待时间比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187096. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7096.
6
Understanding An Informed Public's Views On The Role Of Evidence In Making Health Care Decisions.了解公众对证据在医疗保健决策中作用的知情看法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):566-74. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1112.
7
Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial.公众审议方法在收集医疗保健问题意见方面的有效性：一项随机试验的结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;133:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.024. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
8
Deliberation: obtaining informed input from a diverse public.审议：从多元公众那里获取知情意见。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 Feb;26(1):223-42. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0021.
9
The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: a systematic review.公民陪审团在卫生政策决策中的应用：系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;109:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
10
What is public deliberation?什么是公众审议？
Hastings Cent Rep. 2012 Mar-Apr;42(2):14-7. doi: 10.1002/hast.26.

利用民主审议让退伍军人参与退伍军人健康管理局的复杂政策制定。

Using Democratic Deliberation to Engage Veterans in Complex Policy Making for the Veterans Health Administration.

作者信息

Caverly Tanner J, Robinson Claire H, Krein Sarah L, Forman Jane, Quinn Martha, Skurla Sarah E, Damschroder Laura

机构信息

, , and are Research Investigators; and are Qualitative Analysts; and is a Research Associate; all at the VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development in Michigan. is a Research Specialist at the School of Public Health; Tanner Caverly is an Assistant Professor in the Medical School; and Sarah Krein is an Adjunct Research Professor in the School of Nursing; all at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.

出版信息

Fed Pract. 2020 Jan;37(1):24-32.

PMID:32047352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7010339/
Abstract

A democratic deliberation panel of veterans providing insight into veteran perspectives on resource allocation and the Veterans Choice Act showed the importance and feasibility of engaging veterans in the policy-making process.

摘要

一个由退伍军人组成的民主审议小组，就退伍军人对资源分配和《退伍军人选择法案》的看法提供了见解，这表明让退伍军人参与决策过程具有重要性和可行性。