Grob Lorenz, Bluemel Sena, Biedermann Luc, Fournier Nicolas, Rossel Jean-Benoit, Vavricka Stephan R, Zeitz Jonas, Rogler Gerhard, Stallmach Andreas, Scharl Michael
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan 24;13:1756284819895217. doi: 10.1177/1756284819895217. eCollection 2020.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) needs early interventions and an individual specialist-patient relationship. Distance from a tertiary IBD center might affect patient's disease course and outcome. We investigated whether the patient-to-specialist distance has an impact on the disease course using the well-defined patient collective of the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort Study (SIBDCS).
Patient's home address at diagnosis (postal zip code) was extracted from the SIBDCS database. Distance between each zip code and the nearest located IBD specialist center was calculated and classified into the following three sections based on proximity: <10 km (group 1); 10-35 km (group 2); >35 km (group 3).
Our study included in total 408 IBD patients [234 Crohn's disease (CD), 154 ulcerative colitis (UC), 20 IBD unclassified (IBDU)]. Median age was lowest in group 2 at diagnosis (G1: 28 years; G2: 21 years, G3: 26 years, < 0.01). The diagnostic delay did not differ between groups. CD patients in group 1 were treated more often with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents (72% 56%, = 0.04) and 5-aminosalicylates (44% 28%, = 0.04) than in group 3. UC/IBDU patients in group 1 were treated more often with corticosteroids than patients in group 3 (83% 58%, < 0.01). The occurrence of IBD-related surgeries did not differ between groups.
Patient-to-specialist distance might affect drug treatment. However, disease course and the need for IBD-related surgery does not seem to be associated with a longer distance to specialist care in Switzerland.
炎症性肠病(IBD)需要早期干预以及个体化的医患关系。与三级IBD中心的距离可能会影响患者的病程和预后。我们利用瑞士炎症性肠病队列研究(SIBDCS)中定义明确的患者群体,调查了患者与专科医生的距离是否会对病程产生影响。
从SIBDCS数据库中提取患者诊断时的家庭住址(邮政编码)。计算每个邮政编码与最近的IBD专科中心之间的距离,并根据距离远近分为以下三个区间:<10公里(第1组);10 - 35公里(第2组);>35公里(第3组)。
我们的研究共纳入408例IBD患者[234例克罗恩病(CD),154例溃疡性结肠炎(UC),20例未分类的IBD(IBDU)]。诊断时第2组的中位年龄最低(第1组:28岁;第2组:21岁,第3组:26岁,P < 0.01)。各组之间的诊断延迟无差异。第1组的CD患者接受抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)药物治疗(72%对56%,P = 0.04)和5 - 氨基水杨酸治疗(44%对28%,P = 0.04)的频率高于第3组。第1组的UC/IBDU患者接受皮质类固醇治疗的频率高于第3组患者(83%对58%,P < 0.01)。各组之间IBD相关手术的发生率无差异。
患者与专科医生的距离可能会影响药物治疗。然而,在瑞士,病程以及IBD相关手术的需求似乎与距离专科医疗较远并无关联。