Poordad Fred, Terrault Norah A, Alkhouri Naim, Tian Wei, Allen Lee F, Rabinovitz Mordechai
Texas Liver Institute and University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Keck Medicine at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Int J Hepatol. 2020 Jan 25;2020:5421632. doi: 10.1155/2020/5421632. eCollection 2020.
Thrombocytopenia complicates the management of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) undergoing invasive procedures with a bleeding risk. Until recently, prophylactic platelet transfusion was the only treatment option, but has significant safety and efficacy limitations. Phase 3 data demonstrated the superiority of avatrombopag to placebo in reducing platelet transfusions for bleeding, supporting its recent approval.
Integrated analyses of pooled data ( = 435) from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies assessed the original efficacy endpoints. Additional analyses included subgroup analyses, alternate Baseline platelet count definitions, and another efficacy endpoint.
Avatrombopag was superior to placebo in increasing patients not requiring a platelet transfusion or rescue procedure, those achieving a platelet count ≥50 × 10/L on Procedure Day, and the change in platelet counts from Baseline. The avatrombopag treatment effect was consistently positive across clinically important disease and Baseline clinical characteristic subgroups, and using alternate Baseline platelet count cohort definitions. Similarly, more avatrombopag-treated patients achieved ≥50 × 10/L platelets with an increase of ≥20 × 10/L from Baseline. The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar between avatrombopag and placebo. Further, safety data demonstrated a low risk for thromboembolic events and hepatotoxicity.
These integrated analyses confirmed the superiority of avatrombopag to placebo in reducing platelet transfusions or rescue procedures for bleeding in patients with thrombocytopenia and CLD scheduled to undergo an invasive procedure, and its tolerable safety profile. Importantly, these data warrant reconsideration of clinical decision making regarding the need to treat thrombocytopenia in patients with CLD. This trial was registered with NCT01972529 and NCT01976104.
血小板减少症使患有慢性肝病(CLD)且有出血风险而需接受侵入性操作的患者的治疗变得复杂。直到最近,预防性血小板输注仍是唯一的治疗选择,但存在显著的安全性和有效性限制。3期数据证明了阿伐曲泊帕在减少因出血而进行的血小板输注方面优于安慰剂,这支持了其近期获批。
对两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的3期研究的汇总数据(n = 435)进行综合分析,评估原始疗效终点。额外分析包括亚组分析、替代基线血小板计数定义以及另一个疗效终点。
在无需血小板输注或抢救程序的患者、在操作日血小板计数≥50×10⁹/L的患者以及血小板计数相对于基线的变化方面,阿伐曲泊帕优于安慰剂。在具有临床重要意义的疾病和基线临床特征亚组中,以及使用替代基线血小板计数队列定义时,阿伐曲泊帕的治疗效果始终呈阳性。同样,更多接受阿伐曲泊帕治疗的患者血小板计数≥50×10⁹/L,且相对于基线增加≥20×10⁹/L。阿伐曲泊帕和安慰剂之间不良事件的发生率和严重程度相似。此外,安全性数据表明血栓栓塞事件和肝毒性风险较低。
这些综合分析证实,对于计划接受侵入性操作的血小板减少症和CLD患者,阿伐曲泊帕在减少因出血而进行的血小板输注或抢救程序方面优于安慰剂,且其安全性可耐受。重要的是,这些数据值得重新考虑关于CLD患者血小板减少症治疗必要性的临床决策。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT01972529和NCT019761。