Hafizi Sayed, Nadeau Christine, Gazarin Mohamed, Mulligan Emily
Winchester District Memorial Hospital, 566 Louise St, Winchester, ON, Canada K0C 2K0.
Case Rep Surg. 2020 Jan 28;2020:5283279. doi: 10.1155/2020/5283279. eCollection 2020.
A 35-year-old female patient with no previously documented allergies who was admitted for elective gynaecological surgery, developed rapid onset, severe anaphylaxis, with dyspnea and cardiovascular collapse, in the operating theatre after receiving routine IV cefazolin prior to induction of anesthesia. She failed to improve with two doses of intramuscular epinephrine followed by two boluses of intravenous epinephrine, but responded to an epinephrine infusion. She was assessed by Internal Medicine and discharged home the following day. This event demonstrates the speed, severity, and profound hypotension in an allergic reaction from intravenous medication, challenges in managing anaphylaxis, and importance of prompt administration of epinephrine via IM route, followed by IV if necessary, in the OR. The case highlighted the inability to ascertain the causative agent through typical allergy testing.
一名35岁女性患者,既往无过敏史,因择期妇科手术入院。在麻醉诱导前接受常规静脉注射头孢唑林后,于手术室迅速出现严重过敏反应,伴有呼吸困难和心血管虚脱。给予两剂肌肉注射肾上腺素,随后两次静脉推注肾上腺素后病情无改善,但对肾上腺素输注有反应。内科对其进行评估,次日出院。该事件表明静脉用药过敏反应的速度、严重性和严重低血压,过敏反应管理的挑战,以及在手术室通过肌肉注射途径迅速给予肾上腺素(必要时随后静脉注射)的重要性。该病例突出了通过典型过敏试验无法确定病因。