• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 Cyberknife 动态弧实施 SBRT 的剂量学准确性。

Dosimetric accuracy of delivering SBRT using dynamic arcs on Cyberknife.

机构信息

Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SM2 5PT, UK.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2020 Apr;47(4):1533-1544. doi: 10.1002/mp.14090. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1002/mp.14090
PMID:32048303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7216988/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Several studies have demonstrated potential improvements in treatment time through the use of dynamic arcs for delivery of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on Cyberknife. However, the delivery system has a finite accuracy, so that potential exists for dosimetric uncertainties. This study estimates the expected dosimetric accuracy of dynamic delivery of SBRT, based on realistic estimates of the uncertainties in delivery parameters.

METHODS

Five SBRT patient cases (prostate A - conventional, prostate B - brachytherapy-type, lung, liver, partial left breast) were retrospectively studied. Treatment plans were produced for a fixed arc trajectory using fluence optimization, segmentation, and direct aperture optimization. Dose rate uncertainty was modeled as a smoothly varying random fluctuation of ± 1.0%, ±2.0% or ± 5.0% over a time period of 10, 30 or 60 s. Multileaf collimator uncertainty was modeled as a lag in position of each leaf up to 0.25 or 0.5 mm. Robot pointing error was modeled as a shift of the target location, with the direction of the shift chosen as a random angle with respect to the multileaf collimator and with a random magnitude in the range 0.0-1.0 mm at the delivery nodes and with an additional random magnitude of 0.5-1.0 mm in between the delivery nodes. The impact of the errors was investigated using dose-volume histograms.

RESULTS

Uncertainty in dose rate has the effect of varying the total monitor units delivered, which in turn produces a variation in mean dose to the planning target volume. The random sampling of dose rate error produces a distribution of mean doses with a standard deviation proportional to the magnitude of the dose rate uncertainty. A lag in multileaf collimator position of 0.25 or 0.5 mm produces a small impact on the delivered dose. In general, an increase in the PTV mean dose of around 1% is observed. An error in robot pointing of the order of 1 mm produces a small increase in dose inhomogeneity to the planning target volume, sometimes accompanied by an increase in mean dose by around 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Based upon the limited data available on the dose rate stability and geometric accuracy of the Cyberknife system, this study estimates that dynamic arc delivery can be accomplished with sufficient accuracy for clinical application. Dose rate variation produces a change in dose to the planning target volume according to the perturbation of total monitor units delivered, while multileaf collimator lag and robot pointing error typically increase the mean dose to the planning target volume by up to 1%.

摘要

目的

多项研究表明,在 Cyberknife 上使用动态弧形进行立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)可潜在地缩短治疗时间。然而,该输送系统的精度有限,因此存在剂量不确定性的潜在风险。本研究基于对输送参数不确定性的实际估计,估算了动态输送 SBRT 的预期剂量学准确性。

方法

回顾性研究了 5 例 SBRT 患者(前列腺 A-常规,前列腺 B-近距离治疗型,肺,肝,左半乳)。使用通量优化、分割和直接孔径优化为固定弧形轨迹生成治疗计划。剂量率不确定性建模为在 10、30 或 60 s 的时间段内以±1.0%、±2.0%或±5.0%的平滑变化随机波动。多叶准直器不确定性建模为每个叶片位置的滞后,最大滞后为 0.25 或 0.5 mm。机器人指向误差建模为目标位置的移位,移位方向为多叶准直器的随机角度,在输送节点处的随机幅度为 0.0-1.0 mm,在输送节点之间的随机幅度为 0.5-1.0 mm。使用剂量-体积直方图研究了误差的影响。

结果

剂量率的不确定性会影响输送的总监测单位数,从而导致计划靶区的平均剂量发生变化。剂量率误差的随机抽样产生了一个平均剂量分布,其标准差与剂量率不确定性的大小成正比。多叶准直器位置滞后 0.25 或 0.5 mm 会对输送剂量产生很小的影响。通常,观察到计划靶区的平均剂量增加约 1%。机器人指向误差在 1 mm 左右会导致计划靶区的剂量不均匀性略有增加,有时还会导致平均剂量增加约 1%。

结论

基于 Cyberknife 系统的剂量率稳定性和几何精度的有限数据,本研究估计,动态弧形输送可以达到足够的精度,适用于临床应用。剂量率变化会根据输送的总监测单位数的扰动改变计划靶区的剂量,而多叶准直器滞后和机器人指向误差通常会使计划靶区的平均剂量增加高达 1%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/d8a69f8e91aa/MP-47-1533-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/aad3f70c01c6/MP-47-1533-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/041784b1ce49/MP-47-1533-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/890169d8b85e/MP-47-1533-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/c53312d82344/MP-47-1533-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/2331373a49f7/MP-47-1533-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/b0194b8489ce/MP-47-1533-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/0e4b0ed226b0/MP-47-1533-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/2d7ec1dac21c/MP-47-1533-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/d117f16ceeae/MP-47-1533-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/3dd49ea54812/MP-47-1533-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/d8a69f8e91aa/MP-47-1533-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/aad3f70c01c6/MP-47-1533-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/041784b1ce49/MP-47-1533-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/890169d8b85e/MP-47-1533-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/c53312d82344/MP-47-1533-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/2331373a49f7/MP-47-1533-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/b0194b8489ce/MP-47-1533-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/0e4b0ed226b0/MP-47-1533-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/2d7ec1dac21c/MP-47-1533-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/d117f16ceeae/MP-47-1533-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/3dd49ea54812/MP-47-1533-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5314/7216988/d8a69f8e91aa/MP-47-1533-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Dosimetric accuracy of delivering SBRT using dynamic arcs on Cyberknife.利用 Cyberknife 动态弧实施 SBRT 的剂量学准确性。
Med Phys. 2020 Apr;47(4):1533-1544. doi: 10.1002/mp.14090. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
2
Treatment planning optimization with beam motion modeling for dynamic arc delivery of SBRT using Cyberknife with multileaf collimation.采用多叶准直器的 Cyberknife 动态弧形 SBRT 治疗计划优化与射束运动建模
Med Phys. 2019 Dec;46(12):5421-5433. doi: 10.1002/mp.13848. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
3
Assessment of HDR brachytherapy-replicating prostate radiotherapy planning for tomotherapy, cyberknife and VMAT.评估 HDR 近距离治疗复制的前列腺放射治疗计划,包括适形调强放疗、Cyberknife 和 VMAT。
Med Dosim. 2022;47(1):61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
4
Dosimetric comparison of two arc-based stereotactic body radiotherapy techniques for early-stage lung cancer.两种基于弧形的立体定向体部放射治疗技术用于早期肺癌的剂量学比较。
Med Dosim. 2015 Spring;40(1):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
5
Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.评估蒙特卡罗算法在接受立体定向体部放射治疗的周围型肺癌患者中符合 RTOG 0915 剂量学标准的应用。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 May 8;17(3):277-293. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6077.
6
Benchmarking techniques for stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage glottic laryngeal cancer: LINAC-based non-coplanar VMAT vs. Cyberknife planning.早期声门型喉癌立体定向体部放疗的基准技术:基于 LINAC 的非共面容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)与 Cyberknife 计划的比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Nov 4;14(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1404-z.
7
Implications of a high-definition multileaf collimator (HD-MLC) on treatment planning techniques for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): a planning study.高清多叶准直器(HD-MLC)对立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)治疗计划技术的影响:一项计划研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2009 Jul 10;4:22. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-4-22.
8
Dosimetric Comparison Between 3-Dimensional Conformal and Robotic SBRT Treatment Plans for Accelerated Partial Breast Radiotherapy.三维适形放疗与机器人立体定向体部放疗用于加速部分乳腺放疗的剂量学比较
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jun;15(3):437-45. doi: 10.1177/1533034615601280. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
9
An in vivo dose verification method for SBRT-VMAT delivery using the EPID.一种使用电子射野影像装置(EPID)进行立体定向体部放疗容积调强弧形治疗(SBRT-VMAT)剂量验证的体内方法。
Med Phys. 2015 Dec;42(12):6955-63. doi: 10.1118/1.4935201.
10
Multi-institutional investigation into the robustness of intra-cranial multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery plans to delivery errors.关于颅内多靶点立体定向放射治疗计划对交付误差稳健性的多机构调查。
Med Phys. 2024 Feb;51(2):910-921. doi: 10.1002/mp.16907. Epub 2023 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of technological advances in treatment planning, image guidance, and treatment delivery on target margin design for prostate cancer radiotherapy: an updated review.治疗计划、图像引导和治疗传递技术进步对前列腺癌放射治疗靶区边缘设计的影响:最新综述。
Br J Radiol. 2024 Jan 23;97(1153):31-40. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqad041.
2
Planning issues on linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy.基于直线加速器的立体定向放射治疗中的规划问题。
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Dec 16;10(35):12822-12836. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i35.12822.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment planning optimization with beam motion modeling for dynamic arc delivery of SBRT using Cyberknife with multileaf collimation.采用多叶准直器的 Cyberknife 动态弧形 SBRT 治疗计划优化与射束运动建模
Med Phys. 2019 Dec;46(12):5421-5433. doi: 10.1002/mp.13848. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
2
A novel method for monitoring the constancy of beam path accuracy in CyberKnife.一种用于监测 CyberKnife 中光束路径准确性稳定性的新方法。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 May;20(5):109-119. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12585. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
3
Safety and Efficacy of a Five-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Schedule for Centrally Located Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: NRG Oncology/RTOG 0813 Trial.
一种用于中央型非小细胞肺癌的五分割立体定向体放射治疗方案的安全性和疗效:NRG 肿瘤学/RTOG 0813 试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 20;37(15):1316-1325. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00622. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
4
Dosimetric accuracy of dynamic couch rotation during volumetric modulated arc therapy (DCR-VMAT) for primary brain tumours.原发性脑瘤容积调强弧形治疗(DCR-VMAT)中动态治疗床旋转的剂量学准确性。
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Apr 5;64(8):08NT01. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab0a8e.
5
Recent developments in non-coplanar radiotherapy.非共面放射治疗的最新进展。
Br J Radiol. 2019 May;92(1097):20180908. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180908. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
6
Beam selection for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using Cyberknife with multileaf collimation.使用带有多叶准直器的射波刀进行立体定向消融放疗时的射束选择
Med Eng Phys. 2019 Feb;64:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.12.011. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
7
Robust radiotherapy planning.稳健的放射治疗计划。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Nov 12;63(22):22TR02. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae659.
8
Continuous aperture dose calculation and optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy.容积调强弧形治疗的连续孔径剂量计算和优化。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Oct 26;63(21):21NT01. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae65e.
9
Patient Reported Outcomes in NRG Oncology RTOG 0938, Evaluating Two Ultrahypofractionated Regimens for Prostate Cancer.NRG Oncology RTOG 0938 中的患者报告结局,评估两种前列腺癌超分割方案。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Oct 1;102(2):287-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
10
A continuous arc delivery optimization algorithm for CyberKnife m6.射波刀m6的连续弧形照射优化算法
Med Phys. 2018 Jun 1. doi: 10.1002/mp.13022.