Use of Sentinel Lymph Node Incision for Second Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Radiation.

BACKGROUND

Staged expander to implant breast reconstruction is associated with a high complication rate when the patient has had postmastectomy radiation. With an increasing number of American women undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction after postmastectomy radiation, surgeons may find themselves operating in a radiated field with synthetic devices. We report the performance characteristics of a novel surgical modification to the second stage expander to implant exchange after adjuvant radiation using a transaxillary approach through a prior sentinel lymph node incision, a site remote from the breast implant pocket.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database to evaluate the surgical outcomes of serial patients undergoing second staged expander to implant exchange through the sentinel lymph node incision 6 months or more after completing whole breast radiation. A case matched cohort to age, body mass index, and comorbid status was used to compare outcomes between patients in the group of interest versus a traditional skin sparing incision on the anterior breast mound through the radiated skin envelope. All patients included demonstrated grade 1 or 2 skin changes on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Schema for the skin organ system.

RESULTS

Nineteen breasts were reconstructed for 18 women after immediate tissue expander placement and adjuvant whole breast radiation were included in our group of interest. Forty-one case-matched second controls were identified for the comparison group. There were no intraoperative complications. Two postoperative complications were reported for the sentinel lymph node approach group (10.5%) with an average of 9 months of follow-up: 1 operative exploration for hematoma and 1 minor wound requiring recloser in the office. The case matched cohort demonstrated significantly more minor postoperative complications (P = 0.037) with a total complications rate of 41.4%. There were 31.7% of the patients that experienced a minor complication alone, whereas 9.7% of the case-matched cohort experienced a major complication.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the use of the existing axillary sentinel lymph node access incision for second stage placement of a gel implant after immediate expander and adjuvant radiation therapy. The sentinel lymph node incision approach facilitates layered closure over the breast pocket at a site remote from irradiated tissue, reducing the incidence of postoperative minor complications. Forthcoming long-term data will determine if differences in reported capsular contracture rates can be achieved with a remote transaxillary approach to second stage implant reconstruction after radiation.