Yang Jing, Zhang Jiayou, Han Tian, Liu Chen, Li Xinghang, Yan Luyao, Yang Baifeng, Yang Xiaoming
National Institute of Engineering Technology Research in Combination Vaccine.
Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei province.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(7):e19095. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019095.
Influenza is a severe disease burden among all age groups. This study aimed to review the efficacy of inactivated influenza vaccines with MF59 adjuvant and non-adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccines among all age groups against specific influenza vaccine strains.
Literature search of PubMed, Embase, Medline, OVID, and Cochrane Library Trials (CENTRAL) was implemented up to March 1, 2019. Homogeneity qualified studies were included forData were extracted such as study country location, demographic characteristics, and measure outcomes, and were analyzed by a random effect model and sensitivity analyses to identify heterogeneity. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
We retrieved 1,021 publications and selected 31 studies for full review, including 17 trials for meta-analysis and 6 trials for qualitative synthesis. MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccines demonstrated better immunogenicity against specific vaccine virus strains compared to non-adjuvanted influenza vaccine both in healthy adult group (RR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.28-3.44) and the healthy aged (RR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.10-1.44).
The quality of evidence is moderate to high for seroconversion and seroprotection rates of influenza vaccine. MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccines are superior to non-adjuvanted influenza vaccines to enhance immune responses of vaccination in healthy adults and older adults, and could be considered for routine use especially the monovalent prepandemic influenza vaccines.
流感在所有年龄组中都是严重的疾病负担。本研究旨在回顾含MF59佐剂的灭活流感疫苗和无佐剂灭活流感疫苗在所有年龄组中针对特定流感疫苗毒株的效力。
截至2019年3月1日,对PubMed、Embase、Medline、OVID和Cochrane图书馆试验(CENTRAL)进行文献检索。纳入同质性合格研究以提取诸如研究国家地点、人口统计学特征和测量结果等数据,并通过随机效应模型和敏感性分析进行分析以识别异质性。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。
我们检索到1021篇出版物,并选择31项研究进行全面审查,包括17项用于荟萃分析的试验和6项用于定性综合的试验。与无佐剂流感疫苗相比,含MF59佐剂的流感疫苗在健康成人组(RR = 2.10;95%CI:1.28 - 3.44)和健康老年人中(RR = 1.26;95%CI:1.10 - 1.44)针对特定疫苗病毒毒株表现出更好的免疫原性。
流感疫苗血清转化和血清保护率的证据质量为中到高。含MF59佐剂的流感疫苗在增强健康成人和老年人疫苗接种的免疫反应方面优于无佐剂流感疫苗,尤其对于单价大流行前流感疫苗可考虑常规使用。