Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Jan;46(1):63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.08.038.
To compare small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in terms of safety, refractive outcomes, visual quality, and biomechanical responses in correcting myopia with maximum myopic meridian exceeding 10 diopters (D).
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University.
Prospective, randomized, comparative study.
The study comprised 60 eyes (60 patients) with a maximum myopic meridian exceeding 10 D; 30 eyes were corrected using SMILE and 30 eyes were corrected using FS-LASIK. Patients received preoperative and 6-month postoperative examinations, including refractive outcomes, corneal curve, contrast sensitivity, ocular aberrometry, and corneal biomechanical responses.
At 6 months postoperatively, the uncorrected distance visual acuity was -0.01 ± 0.06 and -0.05 ± 0.10 in the SMILE and LASIK eyes, respectively (P = .08). The corrected distance visual acuity was -0.07 ± 0.07 and -0.08 ± 0.08 (P = .624), respectively. The postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -0.20 ± 0.25 D and -0.03 ± 0.20 D, respectively (P = .008). The posterior corneal curvature was unchanged after SMILE and FS-LASIK (P > .05). The measured corneal thickness was reduced by 137.40 ± 15.01 μm and 155.06 ± 17.43 μm (P < .001). The change in the SE was -0.01 ± 0.26 and -0.13 ± 0.30 from 1 week (P = .103). Only the peak distance (the distance between the highest points of the nondeformed corneal parts) differed between the groups (1.06 ± 1.44 mm vs -0.26 ± 1.16 mm, P = .007). In the SMILE patients, changes in higher-order aberration (P = .018) and spherical aberration (P = .011) were smaller than in LASIK patients.
Compared with LASIK, SMILE might offer superior safety and objective visual quality, comparable stability and efficacy, and a little inferior predictability in correcting maximum myopic meridian exceeding 10 D.
比较小切口微透镜提取术(SMILE)和飞秒激光辅助激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗最大近视子午线超过 10 屈光度(D)的近视患者的安全性、屈光结果、视觉质量和生物力学反应。
中山大学中山眼科中心。
前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
本研究纳入 60 只眼(60 例患者),最大近视子午线超过 10 D;其中 30 只眼接受 SMILE 矫正,30 只眼接受 FS-LASIK 矫正。患者接受术前和术后 6 个月的检查,包括屈光结果、角膜曲率、对比敏感度、眼像差和角膜生物力学反应。
术后 6 个月,SMILE 组和 LASIK 组未矫正远视力分别为-0.01±0.06 和-0.05±0.10(P=0.08)。矫正远视力分别为-0.07±0.07 和-0.08±0.08(P=0.624)。术后球镜等效值(SE)分别为-0.20±0.25 D 和-0.03±0.20 D(P=0.008)。SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 后后表面角膜曲率无变化(P>0.05)。测量的角膜厚度分别减少了 137.40±15.01 μm 和 155.06±17.43 μm(P<0.001)。SE 变化值在 1 周时分别为-0.01±0.26 和-0.13±0.30(P=0.103)。两组间仅最大距离(未变形角膜部分最高点之间的距离)存在差异(1.06±1.44 mm 比-0.26±1.16 mm,P=0.007)。在 SMILE 患者中,高阶像差(P=0.018)和球差(P=0.011)的变化小于 LASIK 患者。
与 LASIK 相比,SMILE 矫正最大近视子午线超过 10 D 时安全性更高、客观视觉质量更好、稳定性和疗效相当、预测性稍差。