Wang Yun, Zhang Xiaofeng, Pan Wenwen, Wang Li, Lou Jing, Xu Yue
Department of Ophthalmology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215004, China.
J Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 19;2025:8431610. doi: 10.1155/joph/8431610. eCollection 2025.
To investigate the impact of horizontal markings on the VisuMax surgical bed headrest on the accuracy of astigmatism correction in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). This retrospective study categorized preoperative astigmatism severity into low-astigmatism (-0.25 to -1.75 D) and moderate-to-high astigmatism (-2.00 to -4.50 D). A preoperative patient fixation training regimen coupled with applying horizontal markings on the VisuMax surgical bed headrest was introduced to improve the precision of astigmatism correction. The effectiveness of SMILE was compared to femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in correcting astigmatism by using Alpins vector analysis, as well as the higher-order aberrations were measured. This study included 170 patients (56 eyes in the low-astigmatism group and 31 eyes in the moderate-to-high astigmatism group of SMILE; 47 eyes in the low-astigmatism group and 36 eyes in the moderate-to-high astigmatism group of FS-LASIK). At 6 months postoperatively, safety and efficacy indices between SMILE and FS-LASIK showed no significant differences for either astigmatism group ( > 0.05). However, significant differences were observed in surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), magnitude of error (ME), and correction index (CI). A considerable difference in equivalent spherical (SE) was found in the low-astigmatism group ( < 0.05). No significant differences were noted in the angle of error (AE) and its absolute value (|AE|) between the two procedures ( > 0.05). Both techniques increased total higher-order aberrations, spherical aberration, and vertical coma, with SMILE associated with a significantly higher increase in vertical coma than FS-LASIK ( < 0.05). Augmented by precise preoperative strategies, including headrest marking and fixation training, SMILE achieves astigmatism axis correction efficacy comparable to FS-LASIK. SMILE and FS-LASIK are effective and comparable in correcting moderate-to-high astigmatism, highlighting their safety, efficacy, and predictability as corrective measures for myopic astigmatism.
为研究VisuMax手术床头枕上的水平标记对小切口飞秒透镜切除术(SMILE)中散光矫正准确性的影响。这项回顾性研究将术前散光严重程度分为低度散光(-0.25至-1.75 D)和中度至高度散光(-2.00至-4.50 D)。引入了术前患者注视训练方案,并在VisuMax手术床头枕上应用水平标记,以提高散光矫正的精度。通过使用Alpins矢量分析比较了SMILE与飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)在矫正散光方面的有效性,并测量了高阶像差。本研究纳入了170例患者(SMILE低度散光组56眼,中度至高度散光组31眼;FS-LASIK低度散光组47眼,中度至高度散光组36眼)。术后6个月,SMILE和FS-LASIK在散光组的安全性和有效性指标均无显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,在手术诱导散光(SIA)、误差大小(ME)和矫正指数(CI)方面观察到显著差异。在低度散光组中,等效球镜(SE)存在显著差异(P<0.05)。两种手术在误差角度(AE)及其绝对值(|AE|)方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。两种技术均增加了总高阶像差、球差和垂直彗差,SMILE导致的垂直彗差增加显著高于FS-LASIK(P<0.05)。通过精确的术前策略(包括头枕标记和注视训练)辅助,SMILE实现了与FS-LASIK相当的散光轴矫正效果。SMILE和FS-LASIK在矫正中度至高度散光方面有效且相当,突出了它们作为近视散光矫正措施的安全性、有效性和可预测性。