Department of Family Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Department of Family Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine.
Fam Med. 2020 Feb;52(2):124-126. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2020.211690.
With younger generations of learners and readily available technology, medical educators are challenged to include active learning methods that may be better for student learning than traditional lecture. Some of these methods, like online modules, can also reduce the demands on clerkship faculty time. We examined how content delivered via interactive, online module compared to traditional lecture for student learning and satisfaction.
Third-year family medicine clerkship students completed questionnaires following either an online module or lecture on orofacial pain. We conducted the study over four consecutive rotations, alternating who received the content via classroom lecture or interactive online module. Students completed a questionnaire comprised of six multiple-choice knowledge questions, five questions with a clinical vignette format to assess application of knowledge, and six questions to assess satisfaction with elements of the course. The Centers of Excellence in Pain Education developed the online module and questionnaire.
We found no differences in knowledge between the in-person lecture and the online module. However, students who completed the online module performed better on the application questions. Students in the lecture group reported greater satisfaction with the course than students in the online group.
Lecture resulted in adequate knowledge recall, but the interactive method resulted in better scores on applying knowledge to new situations. Providing an online module where students can practice applying knowledge is important for higher levels of learning, but it should be noted that satisfaction ratings may decline.
随着年轻一代学习者的出现和便捷的技术,医学教育者面临着挑战,需要采用比传统讲座更有利于学生学习的主动学习方法。这些方法中的一些,如在线模块,也可以减少对实习教师时间的需求。我们研究了通过互动式在线模块传递的内容与传统讲座相比,对学生学习和满意度的影响。
三年级家庭医学实习学生在接受口腔颌面疼痛的在线模块或讲座后完成了问卷。我们在四个连续的轮次中进行了这项研究,轮流让学生通过课堂讲座或互动在线模块接受内容。学生们完成了一份由六个多项选择题组成的问卷,其中五个问题采用临床病例格式评估知识的应用,还有六个问题评估对课程各个要素的满意度。卓越疼痛教育中心开发了在线模块和问卷。
我们发现面对面讲座和在线模块之间的知识没有差异。然而,完成在线模块的学生在应用问题上表现更好。讲座组的学生比在线组的学生对课程更满意。
讲座导致了足够的知识回忆,但互动方法在将知识应用于新情况方面的得分更高。提供一个在线模块,让学生可以练习应用知识,对于更高层次的学习非常重要,但需要注意的是,满意度评分可能会下降。