• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[肥胖与非肥胖阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的临床及多导睡眠图差异]

[The clinical and polysomnographic differences between obese and non-obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea].

作者信息

Gülbay Banu, Acıcan Turan, Erdemir Işık Merda, Çiftci Fatma, Önen Zeynep Pınar

机构信息

Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Tuberk Toraks. 2019 Dec;67(4):258-264. doi: 10.5578/tt.68905.

DOI:10.5578/tt.68905
PMID:32050867
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Obesity has been considered to be one of the important risk factor for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We aimed to investigate the clinical and polysomnographic differences of obese and non-obese OSA patients and how these differences, if any, can be reflected in our daily clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The polysomnographic data of 157 consecutive patients that underwent a sleep study were analyzed. Ninety-nine adult patients with a diagnosis of OSA [apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5/hour] were retrospectively assesed in two groups in respect of obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) or non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m2) according to body mass index (BMI). The clinical and polysomnographic results of the patients in both groups were compared.

RESULT

Between 2010 and 2011, 99 (31 K/68 M) of 157 patients underwent polysomnography were diagnosed with OSA (AHI ≥ 5/hour). Thirthy six patients with OSA (36.4%) were non-obese and 63 patients (63.6%) were obese. There were no differences in the symptoms related to OSA between two groups (p> 0.05). Although there was no statistical significance, the age of the obese patients (50.5 ± 12.7 years) was lower than those of the non-obese (54.9 ± 10.0 years) in polysomnography their total sleep time was shorter and sleep latency later, and sleep efficiency, arousal index, N3%, and REM% were lower and N1% was higher (p> 0.05). While in the obese OSA patients the AHI and Epworth Sleepiness sclae were higher (respectively; p= 0.028, p= 0.01), average oxygen saturation at sleep was lower (p<0.001). While obese OSA patients had similar ratio of hypertension and atherosclerotic heart disease with non-obese OSA patients, whereas diabetes mellitus was higher in obese OSA group (p= 0.036). The use of antidepressant drug was more common in the non-obese patients than the obese patients (p= 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Although obese OSA patients have a more severe disease compared to nonobese OSA patients, there were no significant differences in clinical and polysomnographics findings between two groups. Should be noted that OSA may occur in non-obese patients.

摘要

引言

肥胖被认为是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的重要危险因素之一。我们旨在研究肥胖和非肥胖OSA患者的临床及多导睡眠图差异,以及这些差异(若存在)如何在我们的日常临床实践中体现。

材料与方法

分析了157例连续接受睡眠研究患者的多导睡眠图数据。根据体重指数(BMI),将99例诊断为OSA(呼吸暂停低通气指数[AHI]≥5次/小时)的成年患者回顾性分为肥胖组(BMI≥30kg/m²)和非肥胖组(BMI<30kg/m²)。比较两组患者的临床和多导睡眠图结果。

结果

2010年至2011年期间,157例接受多导睡眠图检查的患者中有99例(31例女性/68例男性)被诊断为OSA(AHI≥5次/小时)。36例OSA患者(36.4%)为非肥胖,63例患者(63.6%)为肥胖。两组间与OSA相关的症状无差异(p>0.05)。尽管无统计学意义,但肥胖患者在多导睡眠图检查中的年龄(50.5±12.7岁)低于非肥胖患者(54.9±10.0岁),其总睡眠时间较短,睡眠潜伏期较晚,睡眠效率、觉醒指数、N3%和快速眼动睡眠(REM)%较低,N1%较高(p>0.05)。肥胖OSA患者的AHI和爱泼沃斯思睡量表得分较高(分别为p=0.028,p=0.01),睡眠时的平均血氧饱和度较低(p<0.001)。肥胖OSA患者与非肥胖OSA患者的高血压和动脉粥样硬化性心脏病发生率相似,而肥胖OSA组的糖尿病发生率较高(p=0.036)。非肥胖患者使用抗抑郁药比肥胖患者更常见(p=0.011)。

结论

尽管肥胖OSA患者的病情比非肥胖OSA患者更严重,但两组间的临床和多导睡眠图检查结果无显著差异。应注意非肥胖患者也可能发生OSA。

相似文献

1
[The clinical and polysomnographic differences between obese and non-obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea].[肥胖与非肥胖阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的临床及多导睡眠图差异]
Tuberk Toraks. 2019 Dec;67(4):258-264. doi: 10.5578/tt.68905.
2
Comparison of clinical and polysomnographic characteristics of non-obese and obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea.非肥胖和肥胖阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的临床和多导睡眠图特征比较
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Nov;90 Suppl 2:48-53.
3
Positional vs nonpositional obstructive sleep apnea patients: anthropomorphic, nocturnal polysomnographic, and multiple sleep latency test data.体位性与非体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者:人体测量学、夜间多导睡眠图及多次睡眠潜伏期测试数据。
Chest. 1997 Sep;112(3):629-39. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.3.629.
4
Clinical and Polysomnographic Characteristics of Nonobese and Obese Chinese Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.非肥胖和肥胖的中国阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的临床和多导睡眠图特征。
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Nov 1;39(7):631-636. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000831. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
5
Positional dependency in Asian patients with obstructive sleep apnea and its implication for hypertension.亚洲阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的体位依赖性及其对高血压的影响。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Aug;137(8):786-90. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2011.122.
6
NREM-AHI greater than REM-AHI versus REM-AHI greater than NREM-AHI in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: clinical and polysomnographic features.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者中 NREM-AHI 大于 REM-AHI 与 REM-AHI 大于 NREM-AHI:临床和多导睡眠图特征。
Sleep Breath. 2011 Sep;15(3):463-70. doi: 10.1007/s11325-010-0358-z. Epub 2010 May 6.
7
Comparison of polysomnographic and clinical presentations and predictors for cardiovascular-related diseases between non-obese and obese obstructive sleep apnea among Asians.亚洲人群中,非肥胖阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与肥胖阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者在多导睡眠图和临床表现及心血管相关疾病预测因子方面的比较。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2013 Jun 15;9(6):553-7. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.2748.
8
Gender differences in clinical and polysomnographic features of obstructive sleep apnea: a clinical study of 2827 patients.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停临床及多导睡眠图特征的性别差异:一项对2827例患者的临床研究
Sleep Breath. 2018 Mar;22(1):241-249. doi: 10.1007/s11325-017-1482-9. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
9
Gender differences in clinical manifestations and polysomnographic findings in Chinese patients with obstructive sleep apnea.中国阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者临床表现和多导睡眠图检查结果的性别差异。
Sleep Breath. 2020 Sep;24(3):1019-1026. doi: 10.1007/s11325-019-01943-y. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
10
Increase in Body Mass Index Decreases Duration of Apneas and Hypopneas in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.体重指数增加可减少阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的呼吸暂停和低通气时间。
Respir Care. 2019 Jan;64(1):77-84. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06297.