State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Key Laboratory for Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, 130117, People's Republic of China.
Education Department of Jilin Province, Key Laboratory of Environmental Materials and Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Jilin Normal University, Siping, Jilin, 136000, People's Republic of China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(13):14634-14641. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08009-7. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
The internal critical concentration represented by the critical body residue (CBR) is an ideal indicator for reflecting the toxicity of a chemical. Although some authors have realized that the CBR can be calculated from the LC via the bioconcentration factor (BCF), the effects of exposure time and exposure concentration on the relationship between the LC and CBR have not been investigated to date. In this paper, the LC and CBR of ortho-dinitrobenzene in zebrafish were experimentally determined and their relationship was investigated. The results showed that ortho-dinitrobenzene exhibited excess toxicity and cannot completely be identified as a reactive compound based on toxic ratio. Comparison of the measured CBR and the CBR calculated from the LC via the BCF showed that there was a 0.46 log unit difference. Investigation of the relationship between the concentration in fish calculated by the toxicokinetic model and exposure time showed that the bio-uptake of fish was fast and reached a steady state in the toxicity test, indicating that the difference in CBR values could not be attributed to the different exposure times used in toxicity and BCF assays. On the other hand, investigation of the measured bioconcentration ratio (BCR) showed that the BCR (or BCF) decreased with increasing exposure concentration. Compared with the CBR calculated from the LC via the BCF, the CBR calculated from the LC via the BCF is close to the measured CBR, suggesting that the difference in CBR values is attributed to the different exposure concentrations used in the BCF and toxicity assays.
体内关键残留浓度(Critical Body Residue,CBR)代表了一种理想的指标,可用于反映化学物质的毒性。虽然一些作者已经意识到 CBR 可以通过生物浓缩系数(Bioconcentration Factor,BCF)从 LC 计算得出,但迄今为止,尚未研究暴露时间和暴露浓度对 LC 和 CBR 之间关系的影响。本文通过实验确定了邻二硝基苯在斑马鱼中的 LC 和 CBR,并对它们之间的关系进行了研究。结果表明,邻二硝基苯表现出超毒性,不能完全被认定为反应性化合物,这与毒性比不符。比较实测 CBR 和通过 BCF 从 LC 计算得出的 CBR 表明,两者之间存在 0.46 个对数单位的差异。通过对毒性动力学模型计算得出的鱼体内浓度与暴露时间之间关系的研究表明,鱼的生物吸收速度很快,在毒性试验中很快达到了稳定状态,这表明 CBR 值的差异不能归因于毒性和 BCF 试验中使用的不同暴露时间。另一方面,对实测生物浓缩比(Bioconcentration Ratio,BCR)的研究表明,BCR(或 BCF)随暴露浓度的增加而降低。与通过 BCF 从 LC 计算得出的 CBR 相比,通过 LC 计算得出的 CBR 更接近实测 CBR,这表明 CBR 值的差异归因于 BCF 和毒性试验中使用的不同暴露浓度。