• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经内镜经胆囊管胆囊引流术适用于接受抗血栓治疗的急性胆囊炎患者。

Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis is feasible for patients receiving antithrombotic therapy.

机构信息

Departments of, Department of, Gastroenterology, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology, Oita San-ai Medical Center, Oita, Japan.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2020 Nov;32(7):1092-1099. doi: 10.1111/den.13650. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1111/den.13650
PMID:32052507
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patients with acute cholecystitis receiving antithrombotic therapy (ATT) have an increased risk of bleeding complications during surgery and percutaneous drainage. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) is recommended for such cases; however, evidence is limited. To investigate this issue further, we performed a retrospective multicenter study.

METHODS

One hundred thirty patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent ETGBD were enrolled. They were divided into an ATT group (continuation of ATT on the day of the procedure and/or heparin substitution) and a Non-ATT group (discontinuation or no use of ATT). The primary outcome was bleeding complication rate, and the secondary outcomes were technical success rate, clinical success rate and total complication rate.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were enrolled in the ATT group, and 47 were enrolled in the Non-ATT group. In the ATT group, 42.2% continued multi-agent ATT. No bleeding complications occurred in either group. There were no significant differences between the ATT and Non-ATT groups in the technical success rate (84.3% vs 89.4%, P = 0.426 respectively) or the clinical success rate (97.1% vs 100%, P = 0.259, respectively). The overall early complication rate was 3.1% (4/130): mild pancreatitis (n = 3) and cholangitis (n = 1). Stent dysfunction was found in 10.9% of patients (at 196 days on average), and the 12-month stent patency rate was 69.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was found in the bleeding complication rate between ETGBD with and without ATT. ETGBD may be an ideal drainage method for patients with acute cholecystitis receiving ATT.

摘要

目的

接受抗血栓治疗(ATT)的急性胆囊炎患者在手术和经皮引流期间有出血并发症的风险增加。对于此类病例,建议进行内镜经乳头胆囊引流(ETGBD);然而,证据有限。为了进一步研究这个问题,我们进行了一项回顾性多中心研究。

方法

共纳入 130 例接受 ETGBD 的急性胆囊炎患者。他们被分为 ATT 组(手术当天继续 ATT 和/或肝素替代)和非 ATT 组(停药或不使用 ATT)。主要结局是出血并发症发生率,次要结局是技术成功率、临床成功率和总并发症发生率。

结果

83 例患者入组 ATT 组,47 例患者入组非 ATT 组。在 ATT 组中,42.2%的患者继续使用多药物 ATT。两组均未发生出血并发症。ATT 组和非 ATT 组在技术成功率(分别为 84.3%和 89.4%,P=0.426)或临床成功率(分别为 97.1%和 100%,P=0.259)方面无显著差异。总的早期并发症发生率为 3.1%(4/130):轻度胰腺炎(n=3)和胆管炎(n=1)。支架功能障碍在 10.9%的患者中发现(平均 196 天),12 个月的支架通畅率为 69.0%。

结论

ETGBD 联合和不联合 ATT 的出血并发症发生率无显著差异。ETGBD 可能是接受 ATT 的急性胆囊炎患者的一种理想引流方法。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis is feasible for patients receiving antithrombotic therapy.经内镜经胆囊管胆囊引流术适用于接受抗血栓治疗的急性胆囊炎患者。
Dig Endosc. 2020 Nov;32(7):1092-1099. doi: 10.1111/den.13650. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
2
Current Status in the Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy: Is Endoscopic Drainage Feasible?- A Systematic Review.接受抗血栓治疗的急性胆囊炎患者的治疗现状:内镜引流是否可行?——一项系统评价
Clin Endosc. 2020 Mar;53(2):176-188. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.177. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
3
Feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis patients receiving antithrombotic therapy.接受抗血栓治疗的急性胆囊炎患者行内镜超声引导下胆囊引流的可行性。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul-Aug;33(4):391-397. doi: 10.20524/aog.2020.0496. Epub 2020 May 15.
4
Incidence and management of cystic duct perforation during endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎内镜经乳头胆囊引流术中胆囊管穿孔的发生率及处理
Dig Endosc. 2022 Jan;34(1):207-214. doi: 10.1111/den.13959. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
5
Clinical outcomes and predictors of technical failure of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis.内镜经乳头胆囊引流术治疗急性胆囊炎的技术失败的临床结果和预测因素。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar;58(3):286-290. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2118554. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
6
Factors affecting technical success of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis.影响内镜经乳头胆囊引流术治疗急性胆囊炎技术成功的因素。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Jul;27(7):429-436. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.744. Epub 2020 May 26.
7
Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for the management of acute calculus cholecystitis patients unfit for urgent cholecystectomy.经内镜经胆囊管胆囊引流术治疗不适合紧急胆囊切除术的急性结石性胆囊炎患者。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 9;15(10):e0240219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240219. eCollection 2020.
8
The Success Rate Is Lower but Completion Rate of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Is higher in Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage than Percutaneous Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis.内镜经乳头胆囊引流术治疗急性胆囊炎的成功率较低,但腹腔镜胆囊切除术的完成率较高。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Aug 1;34(4):413-418. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001294.
9
Strategy Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage to Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage, Following Failed Emergent Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage.急诊内镜经乳头胆囊引流失败后,内镜超声引导下胆囊引流与经皮经肝胆囊引流的策略比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 10;12(22):7034. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227034.
10
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: An updated meta-analysis.内镜经乳头胆囊引流术在急性胆囊炎中的疗效与安全性:一项更新的荟萃分析。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Aug 16;13(8):345-355. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i8.345.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic management of acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients: A comprehensive review article.高危手术患者急性胆囊炎的内镜治疗:一篇综述文章
DEN Open. 2025 May 6;6(1):e70133. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70133. eCollection 2026 Apr.
2
Feasibility of a novel 5F plastic stent in endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis.新型5F塑料支架在内镜经乳头胆囊引流治疗急性胆囊炎中的可行性
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jan 7;13:a24657130. doi: 10.1055/a-2465-7130. eCollection 2025.
3
Strategy Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage to Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage, Following Failed Emergent Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage.
急诊内镜经乳头胆囊引流失败后,内镜超声引导下胆囊引流与经皮经肝胆囊引流的策略比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 10;12(22):7034. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227034.
4
Factors predicting technical failure of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis.预测急性胆囊炎内镜经乳头胆囊引流技术失败的因素。
DEN Open. 2023 Oct 31;4(1):e308. doi: 10.1002/deo2.308. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Endoscopic Internalization by Cutting the Endoscopic Transpapillary Nasogallbladder Drainage Tube in Management of Acute Cholecystitis: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.通过切断内镜经乳头鼻胆囊引流管进行内镜内引流治疗急性胆囊炎:一项回顾性多中心队列研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 14;11(24):7415. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247415.
6
Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage for Recurrent Cholecystitis after Covered Self-expandable Metal Stent Placement for Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影下胆囊引流术用于不可切除恶性胆道梗阻覆膜自膨式金属支架置入术后复发性胆囊炎
Intern Med. 2023 Jan 15;62(2):237-241. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9706-22. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
7
Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage for Cholecystitis in Poor Surgical Candidates: An Updated Comprehensive Review.内镜下胆囊引流术治疗手术风险高的胆囊炎患者的长期预后:最新综合综述
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 21;10(21):4842. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214842.
8
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: An updated meta-analysis.内镜经乳头胆囊引流术在急性胆囊炎中的疗效与安全性:一项更新的荟萃分析。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Aug 16;13(8):345-355. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i8.345.
9
Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for management of acute cholecystitis with coagulopathy.经内镜经胆囊管胆囊引流术治疗伴有凝血功能障碍的急性胆囊炎。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Mar;49(3):300060521996912. doi: 10.1177/0300060521996912.