Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation & Safety, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Department of Pharmaceutics, Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Mar;13(2):352-361. doi: 10.1111/cts.12719. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
Generic entry of newer anticoagulants is expected to decrease the costs of atrial fibrillation management. However, when making switches between brand and generic medications, bioequivalence concerns are possible. The objectives of this study were to predict and compare the lifetime cost-effectiveness of brand dabigatran with hypothetical future generics. Markov microsimulations were modified to predict the lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years of patients on either brand or generic dabigatran from a US private payer perspective. Event rates for generics were predicted using previously developed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models. The analyses showed that generic dabigatran with lower-than-brand systemic exposure were dominant. Meanwhile, generic dabigatran with extremely high systemic exposure was not cost-effective compared with the brand reference. Cost-effectiveness of generic medications cannot always be assumed as shown in this example. Combined use of pharmacometric and pharmacoeconomic models can assist in decision making between brand and generic pharmacotherapies.
新型抗凝剂的通用药物的引入预计将降低房颤管理的成本。然而,在品牌药和仿制药之间进行转换时,可能会存在生物等效性方面的担忧。本研究的目的是预测和比较品牌达比加群和假设的未来仿制药的终生成本效益。采用马科夫微模拟方法,从美国私人支付者的角度预测使用品牌或仿制药达比加群的患者终生成本和质量调整生命年。仿制药的事件发生率采用已建立的药代动力学-药效动力学模型进行预测。分析表明,与品牌药物相比,系统暴露低于品牌药物的仿制药具有优势。而与品牌参考药物相比,系统暴露极高的仿制药并不具有成本效益。本研究示例表明,仿制药的成本效益并不总是可以假定的。药代动力学和药物经济学模型的联合使用可以帮助在品牌药物和仿制药治疗之间做出决策。