Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Sorbonne Université, MNHN, CNRS, EPHE, Paris, France.
Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CP51, Paris, France.
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 13;15(2):e0217956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217956. eCollection 2020.
Molecular data are now commonly used in taxonomy for delimiting cryptic species. In the case of giraffes, which were treated as a single species (Giraffa camelopardalis) during half of a century, several molecular studies have suggested a splitting into four to seven species, but the criteria applied for taxonomic delimitation were not fully described. In this study, we have analysed all multi-locus DNA sequences available for giraffes using multispecies coalescent (MSC: *BEAST, BPP and STACEY), population genetic (STRUCTURE, allelic networks, haplotype network and bootstrapping, haplowebs and conspecificity matrix) and phylogenetic (MrBayes, PhyML, SuperTRI) methods to identify the number of species. Our results show that depending on the method chosen, different taxonomic hypotheses, recognizing from two to six species, can be considered for the genus Giraffa. Our results confirm that MSC methods can lead to taxonomic over-splitting, as they delimit geographic structure rather than species. The 3-species hypothesis, which recognizes G. camelopardalis sensu strico A, G. giraffa, and G. tippelskirchi, is highly supported by phylogenetic analyses and also corroborated by most population genetic and MSC analyses. The three species show high levels of nucleotide divergence in both nuclear (0.35-0.51%) and mitochondrial sequences (3-4%), and they are characterised by 7 to 12 exclusive synapomorphies (ES) detected in nine of the 21 nuclear introns analysed for this study. By contrast, other putative species, such as G. peralta, G. reticulata, G. thornicrofti or G. tippelskirchi sensu stricto, do not exhibit any ES in the nuclear genes. A robust mito-nuclear conflict was found for the position and monophyly of G. giraffa and G. tippelskirchi, which is interpreted as the result of a mitochondrial introgression from Masai to southeastern giraffe during the Pleistocene and nuclear gene flow mediated by male dispersal between southern populations (subspecies G. g. giraffa and G. g. angolensis).
分子数据现在常用于隐种的分类学界定。在半个世纪的时间里,长颈鹿被视为一个单一物种(Giraffa camelopardalis),但几项分子研究表明,长颈鹿实际上可能分为四个到七个物种,但分类学界定所应用的标准并未得到充分描述。在这项研究中,我们使用多物种合并分析(*BEAST、BPP 和 STACEY)、种群遗传(STRUCTURE、等位基因网络、单倍型网络和自举法、haplowebs 和同物特异性矩阵)和系统发育(MrBayes、PhyML、SuperTRI)方法分析了所有可用的多基因座 DNA 序列,以确定物种数量。研究结果表明,根据所选方法的不同,可以考虑采用从两个到六个物种的分类学假设来识别长颈鹿属。研究结果证实,多物种合并分析方法可能导致过度分类,因为它们界定的是地理结构,而不是物种。3 个物种的假说,即严格意义上的 G. camelopardalis A、G. giraffa 和 G. tippelskirchi,得到了系统发育分析的高度支持,也得到了大多数种群遗传和多物种合并分析的支持。这三个物种在核序列(0.35-0.51%)和线粒体序列(3-4%)中都显示出很高的核苷酸差异水平,并且在分析的 21 个核内含子中的 9 个中具有 7 到 12 个独特的共形特征(ES)。相比之下,其他假定的物种,如 G. peralta、G. reticulata、G. thornicrofti 或严格意义上的 G. tippelskirchi,在核基因中没有表现出任何 ES。研究发现,G. giraffa 和 G. tippelskirchi 的位置和单系性存在强烈的线粒体-核冲突,这被解释为更新世期间马赛长颈鹿向东南长颈鹿的线粒体渗入以及雄性扩散介导的南部种群(亚种 G. g. giraffa 和 G. g. angolensis)之间的核基因流的结果。