Department of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Oct;22(5):591-600. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2020.1722236. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
The aim of this study was to investigate international oesophageal screening (OS) practices during videofluoroscopy (VFS) amongst speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and to establish SLP perspectives regarding OS during VFS. A 25-item online survey was developed and disseminated internationally. Respondents were SLPs with dysphagia and VFS experience. Information was sought on OS practices and perspectives. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse results. A total of 202 SLPs completed the survey from USA, UK, Ireland, New Zealand, Australia and Austria. Fifty-eight per cent ( = 117/202) of SLPs internationally include an OS during VFS. This rate varies across USA (81%; 91/113), UK (69%; 18/26) and Ireland (60%; 18/30). Only 25% (29/117) of SLPs use a validated OS protocol. Most SLPs perform an OS in an anterior-posterior view (55%; 64/117) with patients seated (54%; 64/117). Bolus consistencies administered vary greatly. SLPs evaluate oesophageal bolus clearance (81% (95/117), bolus redirection (64%; 75/117), oesophageal transit time (49%; 57/117) and oesophageal pathology (11%; 13/117). Perceived challenges include scope of practice, patient positioning, protocol uncertainty and multidisciplinary support. Over half of SLPs internationally responding to the survey include an OS during VFS. Few follow validated protocols and analysis practices vary. OS guidelines and training opportunities are needed to ensure validated OS protocols are adopted into clinical practice.
本研究旨在调查言语语言病理学家(SLP)在透视吞咽功能检查(VFS)中进行国际食管筛查(OS)的实践情况,并确定 SLP 对 VFS 中 OS 的看法。开发了一个包含 25 个项目的在线调查,并在国际上进行了传播。受访者为有吞咽困难和 VFS 经验的 SLP。调查内容包括 OS 实践和观点。使用描述性统计分析结果。共有来自美国、英国、爱尔兰、新西兰、澳大利亚和奥地利的 202 名 SLP 完成了这项调查。国际上 58%(202 名中的 117 名)的 SLP 在 VFS 中纳入了 OS。这一比例在美国(81%,91/113)、英国(69%,18/26)和爱尔兰(60%,18/30)之间有所不同。只有 25%(117 名中的 29 名)的 SLP 使用经过验证的 OS 协议。大多数 SLP 以前后位视图(55%,64/117)并让患者坐立位(54%,64/117)进行 OS。所给予的食团一致性差异很大。SLP 评估食管食团清除(81%(95/117)、食团改道(64%,75/117)、食管传输时间(49%,57/117)和食管病理学(11%,13/117)。感知到的挑战包括实践范围、患者体位、协议不确定性和多学科支持。国际上回应调查的 SLP 中有一半以上在 VFS 中进行 OS。很少有 SLP 遵循经过验证的协议,分析实践也存在差异。需要 OS 指南和培训机会,以确保将经过验证的 OS 协议纳入临床实践。