• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Failure of short versus long cephalomedullary nail after intertrochanteric fractures.股骨转子间骨折后短与长髓内钉的失效情况。
J Orthop. 2019 Nov 6;18:209-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.10.018. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
2
Complications of short versus long cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric femur fractures, minimum 1 year follow-up.用于股骨转子间骨折的短与长型髓内钉的并发症,至少1年随访
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 May;25(4):665-70. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1557-2. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
3
Periprosthetic fracture rate after short and long hip nails: Analysis of a regional health database.短柄和长柄髋钉术后的假体周围骨折发生率:区域性健康数据库分析。
Injury. 2022 Jun;53(6):2195-2198. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
4
Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years.短与长股骨近端髓内钉治疗 65 岁以上老年股骨转子间骨折。
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jul;28(7):391-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000036.
5
Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for Fixation of Stable Versus Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center.在一级创伤中心使用短型与长型股骨近端髓内钉固定稳定型与不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的对比研究
Orthopedics. 2019 Mar 1;42(2):e202-e209. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190118-03. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
6
Prospective randomized study comparing two cephalomedullary nails for elderly intertrochanteric fractures: Zimmer natural nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation II.比较两种用于老年股骨转子间骨折的髓内钉的前瞻性随机研究:捷迈自然钉与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉II型
Injury. 2017 Jul;48(7):1550-1557. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
7
Is distal locking of long nails for intertrochanteric fractures necessary? A clinical study.长钉远端锁定用于转子间骨折是否必要?一项临床研究。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2014 Dec;5(4):233-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
8
Clinical Outcomes of Intermediate-Length Cephalomedullary Nails for Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Repair in Older Adults.老年股骨转子间骨折修复中使用中长度髁髓内钉的临床结果
Kans J Med. 2020 May 21;13:106-111. eCollection 2020.
9
[Progress on distal interlocking screw of cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric fractures].[股骨近端髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折远端交锁螺钉的研究进展]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;28(9):1177-80.
10
Factors Associated With Failure of Synthesis in the Treatment of Proximal Femur Fractures With Cephalomedullary Nails.与使用髓内钉治疗股骨近端骨折时合成失败相关的因素。
Cureus. 2024 May 30;16(5):e61363. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61363. eCollection 2024 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Efficacy in Pertrochanteric Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Shortest Versus Various Short-Length Cephalomedullary Nails.转子间骨折的比较疗效:最短型与不同短长度髓内钉的随机对照试验
Adv Orthop. 2025 Apr 13;2025:6689145. doi: 10.1155/aort/6689145. eCollection 2025.
2
Association between diabetes mellitus and trochanteric bone mineral density in individuals with osteoporotic fractures: a retrospective study.骨质疏松性骨折患者中糖尿病与转子骨矿物质密度的关联:一项回顾性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 17;11:1492603. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1492603. eCollection 2024.
3
[Comparison of effectiveness of long and short proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in treatment of type A2.3 intertrochanteric fracture of femur].[股骨近端防旋长钉与短钉治疗股骨A2.3型粗隆间骨折的疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jun 15;38(6):703-709. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202401114.
4
Comparison of Outcomes of Long Versus Short Cephalomedullary Nails for the Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 14,547 Patients.用于固定股骨转子间骨折的长与短髓内钉治疗效果比较:对14547例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析
Indian J Orthop. 2023 Jun 14;57(8):1165-1187. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-00915-5. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
New Prognostic Factors in Operated Extracapsular Hip Fractures: Infection and GammaTScore.手术治疗的髋关节囊外骨折的新预后因素:感染和 GammaTScore。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;19(18):11680. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811680.
6
Clinical outcomes following long versus short cephalomedullary devices for fixation of extracapsular hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.长与短头钉髓内固定装置治疗髋关节囊外骨折的临床疗效比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 14;11(1):23997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03210-1.
7
Biomechanical comparison of medial sustainable nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation in the treatment of an unstable intertrochanteric fracture.内侧支撑钉与股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的生物力学比较
Bone Joint Res. 2020 Dec;9(12):840-847. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.912.BJR-2020-0284.R1.

本文引用的文献

1
Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for Fixation of Stable Versus Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center.在一级创伤中心使用短型与长型股骨近端髓内钉固定稳定型与不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的对比研究
Orthopedics. 2019 Mar 1;42(2):e202-e209. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190118-03. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
2
Short-term Medical Complications Following Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails.短型与长型股骨髓内钉术后的短期医学并发症
Orthopedics. 2018 Sep 1;41(5):e636-e642. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180711-03. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
3
Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture.髋部骨折的流行病学与社会成本
Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1458-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
4
Long and short intramedullary nails for fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1, A2 and A3): A systematic review and meta-analysis.用于股骨转子间骨折固定(OTA 31-A1、A2和A3)的长短髓内钉:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Sep;103(5):685-690. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 May 22.
5
The long and short of cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fracture.髓内钉治疗骨质疏松性转子间骨折的优缺点
Singapore Med J. 2017 Feb;58(2):85-91. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016048. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
6
Comparative study of the second and third generation of gamma nail for trochanteric fractures: review of 218 cases.第二代与第三代伽马钉治疗转子间骨折的对比研究:218例病例回顾
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Mar;29(3):e85-90. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000190.
7
Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2).短与长髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折(OTA31-A1 和 A2)。
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 May;28(5):e96-e100. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182a7131c.
8
Gamma nail in the treatment of closed trochanteric fractures. Results and indications of 121 cases.Gamma 钉治疗闭合型转子间骨折。121 例结果和适应证。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Feb;100(1):75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.12.013. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
9
Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years.短与长股骨近端髓内钉治疗 65 岁以上老年股骨转子间骨折。
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jul;28(7):391-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000036.
10
Tip to apex distance in femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a systematic review.股骨粗隆间骨折的尖顶距:一项系统评价
J Orthop Sci. 2013 Jul;18(4):592-8. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0402-5. Epub 2013 May 2.

股骨转子间骨折后短与长髓内钉的失效情况。

Failure of short versus long cephalomedullary nail after intertrochanteric fractures.

作者信息

Bovbjerg Pernille Engell, Larsen Morten Schultz, Madsen Carsten Fladmose, Schønnemann Jesper

机构信息

OPEN Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kresten Philipsensvej 15, 6200, Aabenraa, Denmark.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hospital of Southern Denmark, Denmark.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2019 Nov 6;18:209-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.10.018. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2019.10.018
PMID:32055145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7005477/
Abstract

The aim of study is to examine the frequency of reoperation and difference in failures for short cephalomedullary nail (SN) and long cephalomedullary nail (LN).We included patients with an intertrochanteric fracture treated with Gamma nail (Stryker®). All radiographs were reviewed, TAD and diastasis were measured, and type of failure registered.216 patients were included, 95 short nails and 121 long nails. We found 12 reoperations, 5 in the SN group and 7 in the LN group. Most common failure was cut out. Our study showed no difference in frequency of reoperations or type of failures.

摘要

本研究的目的是检查短型股骨髓内钉(SN)和长型股骨髓内钉(LN)的再次手术频率及失败差异。我们纳入了使用伽马钉(史赛克公司生产)治疗的转子间骨折患者。对所有X线片进行了复查,测量了尖顶距(TAD)和骨间隙,并记录了失败类型。共纳入216例患者,其中95例使用短钉,121例使用长钉。我们发现有12例再次手术,SN组5例,LN组7例。最常见的失败类型是内固定物穿出。我们的研究表明,再次手术频率或失败类型没有差异。