Davenport Michael T, Wooliscroft Jeffrey T, McKibben Maxim J, Shakir Nabeel, Fuchs Joceline S, Yi Yooni A, Viers Boyd R, Bergeson Rachel L, Ward Ellen E, Morey Allen F
Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Feb;9(1):10-15. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.34.
Among men with bulbar strictures, we aimed to analyze stricture characteristics, repair type, and treatment success in younger versus older patient cohorts.
We retrospectively reviewed our single surgeon database with patients undergoing bulbar urethroplasty from 2007 to 2017. This population was then age-stratified into ≤40 and >40-year-old cohorts. Exclusion criteria included patients with penile strictures and those with history of hypospadias. Patient characteristics, surgical approach, and outcome were compiled by medical record and database review. Criterion for success included functional emptying and lack of repeat surgical intervention. Parameters associated with failure were included in multivariate logistic regression models.
Eight hundred and fifty-three patients with bulbar strictures were identified, 231 patients (27.1%) ≤40 years old and 622 patients (72.9%) >40 years old. Mean stricture length was significantly longer in older men (2.3 . 2.7 cm, P=0.005). Excision and primary anastomosis (EPA) were more commonly utilized when managing younger compared to older patient groups (87% in ≤40 group, 77% in >40, P=0.0009). Younger men underwent significantly fewer endoscopic stricture treatments than older men (2.1 . 4.9, P=0.001). Traumatic etiology was more commonly attributable in the younger group (48% .17%, P<0.0001). Younger men presented less frequently with diabetes (1.7% . 21.7%, P<0.0001), coronary artery disease (0.4% . 19.1%, P<0.0001), and erectile dysfunction (11.5% . 29.2%, P<0.0001) relative to older men. Over a median follow-up of 52.4 months, success rates were higher in the ≤40 cohort (97.4%) than the >40 cohort (87.3%, P<0.0001). On multivariate logistic regression, independent predictors of urethroplasty success include younger age), utilization of EPA, and lack of pelvic radiation.
Although men ≤40 years old have a higher incidence of traumatic etiology, bulbar urethroplasty has a higher success rate when compared to patients >40 years old. Bulbar strictures are more amenable to EPA in the younger population, likely due to fewer endoscopic treatments and favorable tissue characteristics.
在患有球部狭窄的男性中,我们旨在分析年轻与老年患者队列中的狭窄特征、修复类型及治疗成功率。
我们回顾性分析了2007年至2017年期间由同一位外科医生进行球部尿道成形术患者的单中心数据库。然后将该人群按年龄分层为≤40岁和>40岁的队列。排除标准包括阴茎狭窄患者和有尿道下裂病史的患者。通过病历和数据库回顾收集患者特征、手术方式及结果。成功标准包括功能排空及无需再次手术干预。将与失败相关的参数纳入多因素逻辑回归模型。
共识别出853例球部狭窄患者,其中231例(27.1%)年龄≤40岁,622例(72.9%)年龄>40岁。老年男性的平均狭窄长度显著更长(2.3对2.7cm,P = 0.005)。与老年患者组相比,在处理年轻患者时更常采用切除一期吻合术(EPA)(≤40岁组为87%,>40岁组为77%,P = 0.0009)。年轻男性接受的内镜下狭窄治疗显著少于老年男性(2.1对4.9,P = 0.001)。年轻组创伤性病因更为常见(48%对17%,P < 0.0001)。相对于老年男性,年轻男性患糖尿病(1.7%对21.7%,P < 0.0001)、冠状动脉疾病(0.4%对19.1%,P < 0.0001)及勃起功能障碍(11.5%对29.2%,P < 0.0001)的比例更低。中位随访52.4个月时,≤40岁队列的成功率高于>40岁队列(97.4%对87.3%,P < 0.0001)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,尿道成形术成功的独立预测因素包括年轻、采用EPA及无盆腔放疗史。
尽管≤40岁男性创伤性病因发生率更高,但与>40岁患者相比,球部尿道成形术成功率更高。在年轻人群中,球部狭窄更适合采用EPA,这可能是由于内镜治疗较少且组织特征良好。