Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, CPO Box 8044, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jan;29(1):154-161. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05891-z. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic repair of two different rotator cuff tear configurations: anterosuperior rotator cuff tear and rotator cuff tears with subscapularis involvement. It was hypothesized that, although both tear configurations would show significant improvement in clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair, the rotator cuff tears with subscapularis involvement where the anterior rotator cable maintains its integrity would have better clinical outcomes and structural integrity.
This study included 226 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears (n = 107, group A) and rotator cuff tears with subscapularis involvement (n = 119, group B). The visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, and active range of motion (ROM) were assessed. Modified belly press test was performed to assess the strength of the subscapularis muscle. Cuff integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance arthrography or computed tomographic arthrography at 6 months after operation.
At 3-year follow-up, the VAS score, SSVs, ASES scores, UCLA shoulder scores, active ROM, and modified belly press test showed significant improvement in both groups (p < 0.001). However, these improvements showed no statistical significance between the two groups. On follow-up radiologic evaluations, no significant difference in re-tear rates between group A (25 of 107, 23.4%) and group B (23 of 119, 19.3%) was observed.
The presence of anterior cable involvement of the anterosuperior rotator cuff tear did not affect postoperative clinical outcomes and re-tear rate compared to rotator cuff tears with subscapularis involvement where the anterior cable integrity was maintained, although the anterosuperior rotator cuff tear was associated with more significant preoperative supraspinatus fatty infiltration. Therefore, the present study determined that it would not be necessary to differentiate treatment protocols between these patterns.
Level III.
本研究旨在比较两种不同肩袖撕裂类型(肩袖前上撕裂和合并肩胛下肌损伤的肩袖撕裂)经关节镜修复后的临床和影像学结果。假设尽管两种撕裂类型在关节镜修复后临床结果均有显著改善,但在前侧肩袖缆线完整的合并肩胛下肌损伤的肩袖撕裂中,其临床结果和结构完整性会更好。
本研究纳入了 226 例行关节镜下肩袖前上撕裂修复的患者(n=107,A 组)和合并肩胛下肌损伤的肩袖撕裂患者(n=119,B 组)。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分、主观肩肘外科医生评分(SSV)、美国肩肘外科医生协会(ASES)评分、加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)肩部评分和主动活动范围(ROM)进行评估。改良的腹部按压试验用于评估肩胛下肌的力量。术后 6 个月采用磁共振关节造影或 CT 关节造影评估肩袖完整性。
在 3 年随访时,两组的 VAS 评分、SSV、ASES 评分、UCLA 肩部评分、主动 ROM 和改良的腹部按压试验均有显著改善(p<0.001)。但两组间这些改善无统计学差异。在随访影像学评估中,A 组(107 例中的 25 例,23.4%)和 B 组(119 例中的 23 例,19.3%)的再撕裂率无显著差异。
与合并肩胛下肌损伤且前侧缆线完整的肩袖撕裂相比,肩袖前上撕裂伴有前侧缆线受累并不影响术后临床结果和再撕裂率,尽管肩袖前上撕裂与更显著的术前冈上肌脂肪浸润相关。因此,本研究确定,对于这两种类型,不需要区分治疗方案。
III 级。