Suppr超能文献

托法替布、巴瑞替尼、乌帕替尼和非戈替尼与阿达木单抗相比在活动性类风湿关节炎患者中的相对疗效和安全性。

Relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib in comparison to adalimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Lee Young Ho, Song Gwan Gyu

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro, 02841, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).

出版信息

Z Rheumatol. 2020 Oct;79(8):785-796. doi: 10.1007/s00393-020-00750-1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The relative efficacy and tolerability of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib compared to adalimumab were assessed in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with inadequate responses to methotrexate (MTX).

METHODS

We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib, and adalimumab in RA patients with inadequate responses to MTX.

RESULTS

Four RCTs comprising 5451 patients met the inclusion criteria. Baricitinib 4 mg + MTX and upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX showed a significantly higher American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate than adalimumab 40 mg + MTX. Ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that baricitinib 4 mg + MTX had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the ACR20 response rate, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, filgotinib 200 mg + MTX, filgotinib 100 mg + MTX, adalimumab 40 mg + MTX, and placebo + MTX. Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX and baricitinib 4 mg + MTX showed significantly higher ACR50 and ACR70 response rates than adalimumab 40 mg + MTX. For herpes zoster infection, the ranking probability based on SUCRA indicated that placebo + MTX was likely to be the safest treatment, followed by filgotinib 200 mg + MTX, filgotinib 100 mg + MTX, adalimumab 40 mg + MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX, and baricitinib 4 mg + MTX. No statistically significant differences were found between the intervention groups in terms of safety.

CONCLUSION

In RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX, baricitinib 4 mg + MTX and upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX showed the highest ACR response rates, suggesting a difference in efficacy among the different JAK inhibitors.

摘要

目的

在对甲氨蝶呤(MTX)反应不足的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中,评估托法替布、巴瑞替尼、乌帕替尼和非戈替尼相较于阿达木单抗的相对疗效和耐受性。

方法

我们进行了一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析,以整合来自随机对照试验(RCT)的直接和间接证据,来检验托法替布、巴瑞替尼、乌帕替尼、非戈替尼和阿达木单抗在对MTX反应不足的RA患者中的疗效和安全性。

结果

四项纳入5451例患者的RCT符合纳入标准。巴瑞替尼4 mg + MTX和乌帕替尼15 mg + MTX的美国风湿病学会20%(ACR20)反应率显著高于阿达木单抗40 mg + MTX。基于累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)的排序概率表明,巴瑞替尼4 mg + MTX实现ACR20反应率的最佳治疗概率最高,其次是乌帕替尼15 mg + MTX、托法替布5 mg + MTX、非戈替尼200 mg + MTX、非戈替尼100 mg + MTX、阿达木单抗40 mg + MTX和安慰剂 + MTX。乌帕替尼15 mg + MTX和巴瑞替尼4 mg + MTX的ACR50和ACR70反应率显著高于阿达木单抗40 mg + MTX。对于带状疱疹感染,基于SUCRA的排序概率表明,安慰剂 + MTX可能是最安全的治疗方法,其次是非戈替尼200 mg + MTX、非戈替尼100 mg + MTX、阿达木单抗40 mg + MTX、托法替布5 mg + MTX、乌帕替尼15 mg + MTX和巴瑞替尼4 mg + MTX。各干预组在安全性方面未发现统计学显著差异。

结论

在对MTX反应不足的RA患者中,巴瑞替尼4 mg + MTX和乌帕替尼15 mg + MTX显示出最高的ACR反应率,表明不同的JAK抑制剂之间存在疗效差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验