Suppr超能文献

三级教学医院急性白血病患者的红细胞输注审核。

Audit of red blood cell transfusion in patients with acute leukemia at a tertiary care university hospital.

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Facultad de Medicina y Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico.

Department of Pathology, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2020 Apr;60(4):724-730. doi: 10.1111/trf.15700. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion support is essential in patients with acute leukemia (AL). A restrictive RBC transfusion approach is assumed to be safe for most individuals with AL. The aim of this audit was to assess RBC transfusion appropriateness in AL patients at an academic center.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

RBC transfusions in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia patients of all ages between January 1, 2013, and March 31, 2019, were analyzed for adherence to evidence-based criteria. Transfusion appropriateness was compared among ordering specialties, patient locations, and hematologic diagnoses. Pretransfusion hemoglobin was compared between categories. Overtransfusion rates were also analyzed. Descriptive statistics and categorical and numerical tests were employed to determine statistical significance.

RESULTS

A total of 510 RBC transfusions were received by 133 AL patients in the departments of internal medicine, hematology, and pediatrics. Overall, 84.5% were appropriate according to established criteria. Internal medicine was the ordering department with the highest rate of appropriateness (88.1%). The outpatient clinic was the location with the highest adherence (85.9%), whereas the intensive care unit had the lowest (70%; p = 0.03). The reasons for most appropriate and inappropriate transfusions were asymptomatic anemia with a hemoglobin below (60.6%) or above (69.6%) 7 g/dL in patients without cardiac disease, respectively. Overtransfusion was present in 22% of episodes.

CONCLUSION

RBC transfusion in AL patients reflected good adherence to guidelines. However, continuing education in transfusion medicine and prospective chart auditing are needed to improve adherence to established guidelines.

摘要

背景

急性白血病(AL)患者需要红细胞(RBC)输血支持。对于大多数 AL 患者,采用限制 RBC 输血方法被认为是安全的。本审计旨在评估学术中心 AL 患者 RBC 输血的适宜性。

研究设计和方法

分析了 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日所有年龄段的急性淋巴细胞白血病和急性髓细胞白血病患者的 RBC 输血,以评估其是否符合循证标准。比较了不同科室、患者位置和血液学诊断的输血适宜性。比较了输血前血红蛋白在不同分类中的差异。还分析了过度输血的发生率。采用描述性统计和分类及数值检验来确定统计学意义。

结果

共有 133 例 AL 患者在内科、血液科和儿科接受了 510 次 RBC 输血。根据既定标准,总体上有 84.5%的输血是适宜的。内科是适宜性最高的(88.1%)的科室。门诊是最符合标准的(85.9%),而重症监护病房是最不符合标准的(70%;p=0.03)。最适宜和最不适宜输血的原因分别是无症状性贫血,血红蛋白<60.6%(无心脏病患者)或>69.6%(无心脏病患者)。22%的输血存在过度输血。

结论

AL 患者的 RBC 输血反映了对指南的良好遵循。然而,需要在输血医学方面进行继续教育和前瞻性图表审核,以提高对既定指南的遵循。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验