Panariello Beatriz Hd, Azabi Asma A, Mokeem Lamia S, AlMady Fahad A, Lippert Frank, Hara Anderson T, Duarte Simone
Department of Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Department of Biomedical Sciences & Comprehensive Care, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Am J Dent. 2020 Feb;33(1):12-16.
To evaluate the in vitro effects of commercially available charcoal dentifrices on Streptococcus mutans biofilm development and their ability to prevent enamel demineralization.
Streptococcus mutans biofilm was formed on polished bovine enamel specimens (n= 9 per treatment), and treated twice-daily for 120 seconds over the course of 5 days with: charcoal dentifrice containing fluoride (1,000 ppm F) (CF+), fluoride-free charcoal dentifrice (CF-), regular fluoride (1,100 ppm F) dentifrice (F+ ), or regular fluoride-free dentifrice (F-). Chlorhexidine (CHX, 0.12%) and deionized water (DIW) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Biofilms were analyzed for bacterial viability (colony-forming units, CFU). The pH of the medium was measured daily. Enamel specimens were analyzed using Vickers microhardness ( HV) and transversal microradiography (TMR). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc tests (α= 0.05).
F+ showed higher pH values than CF+ and CF-, and CF- presented higher pH than CF+, showing that CF+ did not have inhibitory effects on the acidogenicity of cariogenic biofilms. CFU was significantly decreased when specimens were treated with CF+, CF- and F+, compared to specimens treated with DIW (P≤ 0.035) or F- (P≤ 0.001), respectively. However, the reduction observed was minimal (approximately 1 log). CF+ and CF- were less effective than F+ in preventing enamel demineralization as determined using HV (P= 0.041 and P= 0.003, respectively) and TMR ( P≤ 0.001). Both charcoal dentifrices (CF+, CF-) did not show relevant inhibition of S. mutans biofilm growth. Additionally, neither product prevented enamel demineralization compared to a regular fluoride-containing dentifrice.
The tested charcoal dentifrices did not exhibit anticaries potential.
评估市售含炭牙膏对变形链球菌生物膜形成的体外影响及其预防牙釉质脱矿的能力。
在抛光的牛牙釉质标本上形成变形链球菌生物膜(每种处理n = 9),并在5天内每天用以下物质处理两次,每次120秒:含氟(1000 ppm F)的含炭牙膏(CF+)、不含氟的含炭牙膏(CF-)、普通含氟(1100 ppm F)牙膏(F+)或普通无氟牙膏(F-)。洗必泰(CHX,0.12%)和去离子水(DIW)分别用作阳性和阴性对照。分析生物膜的细菌活力(菌落形成单位,CFU)。每天测量培养基的pH值。使用维氏显微硬度(HV)和横向显微放射照相术(TMR)分析牙釉质标本。数据采用单因素方差分析,随后进行事后检验(α = 0.05)。
F+的pH值高于CF+和CF-,CF-的pH值高于CF+,表明CF+对致龋生物膜的产酸性没有抑制作用。与用DIW(P≤0.035)或F-(P≤0.001)处理的标本相比,用CF+、CF-和F+处理的标本CFU显著降低。然而,观察到的减少幅度很小(约1个对数)。使用HV(分别为P = 0.041和P = 0.003)和TMR(P≤0.001)测定,CF+和CF-在预防牙釉质脱矿方面不如F+有效。两种含炭牙膏(CF+、CF-)均未显示出对变形链球菌生物膜生长的相关抑制作用。此外,与普通含氟牙膏相比,这两种产品均未预防牙釉质脱矿。
所测试的含炭牙膏没有防龋潜力。