Suppr超能文献

孕期焦虑评估:现有的多种焦虑量表在测量孕期焦虑方面是否合适且具有可比性?

Assessment of anxiety during pregnancy: are existing multiple anxiety scales suitable and comparable in measuring anxiety during pregnancy?

作者信息

Adhikari Kamala, Patten Scott B, Williamson Tyler, Patel Alka B, Premji Shahirose, Tough Suzanne, Letourneau Nicole, Giesbrecht Gerald, Metcalfe Amy

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Applied Research and Evaluation- Primary Health Care, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.

出版信息

J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Jun;42(2):140-146. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2020.1725462. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study examined the performance of multiple anxiety scales in measuring anxiety during pregnancy, an important issue due to the possible effect of pregnancy-related symptoms on the measurement of anxiety.

METHODS

Secondary data on anxiety, measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State (STAI-S) 20-item and six-item scales, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale-Anxiety Subscale (EPDS-3A) and the Symptoms Checklist-90-Anxiety Subscale (SCL-90), were obtained from two pregnancy cohort studies. Both cohorts completed the EPDS-3A, while 3341 women completed the STAI-S and 2187 women completed the SCL-90, with 231 women participating in both cohorts. Data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and Spearman correlation.

RESULTS

The STAI-6 had adequate model fit, while the STAI-20 and the SCL-90 had inadequate model fit. Model fitness for the EPDS-3A could not be assessed due to its low number of items. The correlation between the STAI-20 and STAI-6 was excellent (=0.93). The correlation of EPDS-3A with other anxiety scales was low to moderate ( (STAI-20) = 0.57, (STAI-6) = 0.53 and (SCL-90) = 0.44). The correlation of SCL-90 with both STAI-20 and STAI-6 was low (<0.50).

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate that these scales do not measure anxiety as a single dimension and that these scales are incomparable and may conceptualize anxiety differently.

摘要

背景

本研究考察了多种焦虑量表在测量孕期焦虑方面的表现,鉴于与妊娠相关的症状可能对焦虑测量产生影响,这是一个重要问题。

方法

从两项妊娠队列研究中获取了关于焦虑的二次数据,这些数据通过状态-特质焦虑量表-状态版(STAI-S)的20项和6项量表、爱丁堡产后抑郁量表-焦虑子量表(EPDS-3A)以及症状自评量表90-焦虑子量表(SCL-90)进行测量。两个队列均完成了EPDS-3A,3341名女性完成了STAI-S,2187名女性完成了SCL-90,其中231名女性参与了两个队列。使用验证性因素分析和斯皮尔曼相关性分析数据。

结果

STAI-6具有足够的模型拟合度,而STAI-20和SCL-90的模型拟合度不足。由于EPDS-3A项目数量较少,无法评估其模型拟合度。STAI-20与STAI-6之间的相关性极佳(=0.93)。EPDS-3A与其他焦虑量表的相关性为低到中度(与STAI-20的相关性=0.57,与STAI-6的相关性=0.53,与SCL-90的相关性=0.44)。SCL-90与STAI-20和STAI-6的相关性均较低(<0.50)。

结论

研究结果表明,这些量表并非将焦虑作为单一维度进行测量,且这些量表不可比,可能对焦虑的概念化有所不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验