Department of Psychological Science, Room 248, University of Vermont, 2 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT 05405, United States of America.
Department of Psychological Science, Room 248, University of Vermont, 2 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT 05405, United States of America.
J Affect Disord. 2020 Apr 1;266:639-645. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
Substance use disorder (SUD) is associated with impaired response inhibition. Given the deficits in emotion regulation associated with SUD, it is unclear if this impairment is exacerbated by emotionally valenced stimuli. Co-occurring conditions may further exacerbate these impairments as many co-occurring conditions further impact emotion regulation. It was hypothesized that negative stimuli may further impact response inhibition for this population.
The current study used the stop-signal task to examine response inhibition to negative, neutral and positive stimuli in a sample of those with a history of SUD and co-occurring depression and anxiety symptoms.
Response inhibition was poorer for negative stimuli relative to neutral stimuli. There was no difference between negative and positive stimuli. Depression severity moderated the difference between response inhibition for negative and neutral stimuli. At elevated depression, response inhibition was worse and there was no difference across emotional stimuli. At low depression, there was a significant difference between negative and neutral stimuli. This effect was not found for anxiety symptoms.
Study participants presented with polysubstance use of varying duration and amount. It is unclear whether findings are attributed to specific substances, or substance use broadly. Additionally, happy, angry, and calm facial emotions were used to represent positive, negative, and neutral valences respectively. It is unclear whether these findings are generalizable to other emotional expressions.
Results suggested that emotionally valenced stimuli affected response inhibition among those with low symptom severity. At elevated symptom severity, response inhibition to all stimuli were impaired.
物质使用障碍(SUD)与反应抑制受损有关。鉴于 SUD 相关的情绪调节缺陷,尚不清楚这种损伤是否会因情绪相关刺激而加剧。共病情况可能会进一步加剧这些损伤,因为许多共病情况会进一步影响情绪调节。研究假设,对于该人群来说,负性刺激可能会进一步影响反应抑制。
本研究使用停止信号任务,在一组有 SUD 和共病抑郁和焦虑症状的个体中,考察对负性、中性和正性刺激的反应抑制。
与中性刺激相比,对负性刺激的反应抑制较差。负性刺激与正性刺激之间无差异。抑郁严重程度调节了负性和中性刺激之间反应抑制的差异。在抑郁升高时,反应抑制更差,且对情绪刺激无差异。在低抑郁时,负性和中性刺激之间存在显著差异。该效应在焦虑症状中未发现。
研究参与者存在多种物质的混合使用,使用时间和剂量不同。尚不清楚这些发现是归因于特定物质,还是广泛的物质使用。此外,快乐、愤怒和平静的面部表情分别代表正性、负性和中性效价。尚不清楚这些发现是否可推广到其他情绪表达。
结果表明,情绪相关刺激会影响低症状严重程度个体的反应抑制。在症状严重程度升高时,对所有刺激的反应抑制均受损。