Parenthood and Cross-Border Surrogacy: What Is 'New'? The ECtHR's First Advisory Opinion.
作者信息
Margaria Alice
机构信息
Department of 'Law and Anthropology', Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Advokatenweg 36, 06114 Halle/Saale, Germany.
出版信息
Med Law Rev. 2020 May 1;28(2):412-425. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwz042.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Parenthood and Cross-Border Surrogacy: What Is 'New'? The ECtHR's First Advisory Opinion.为人父母与跨境代孕：“新”在何处？欧洲人权法院的第一份咨询意见
Med Law Rev. 2020 May 1;28(2):412-425. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwz042.
2
[Access to Assisted Reproductive Technologies, surrogacy, same sex couple parenting].[辅助生殖技术的获取、代孕、同性伴侣育儿]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2012 Aug;40 Suppl 1:3-7. doi: 10.1016/S1297-9589(12)70017-6.
3
Parents' 'fault' must not weigh on their children. Surrogacy as a universal crime in Italy: Is it compatible with bioethical principles?父母的“过错”不应压在孩子身上。意大利的代孕是一种普遍的犯罪：这符合生物伦理原则吗？
Clin Ter. 2024 Jul-Aug;175(4):246-251. doi: 10.7417/CT.2024.5071.
4
Who is a parent? Parenthood in Islamic ethics.谁是父母？伊斯兰伦理中的父母身份。
J Med Ethics. 2007 Oct;33(10):605-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.015396.
5
In re Marriage of Buzzanca: charting a new destiny.关于布赞卡的婚姻案：开创全新命运
West State Univ Law Rev. 1998;26:25-45.
6
Do judges make (a better) law? The French experience.法官能制定（更好的）法律吗？法国的经验。
Not Polit. 2002;18(65):40-3.
7
From Baby M. to Jaycee B.: fathers, mothers, and children in the brave new world.从“宝贝M”到“杰茜B”：勇敢新世界中的父亲、母亲与孩子。
J Contemp Law. 1998;24(2):335-75.
8
Constitutionality of recognizing multiple parental rights in the surrogacy context.在代孕背景下承认多重亲权的合宪性。
Wis Womens Law J. 1992;7-8:67-84.
9
The legal aspects of parental rights in assisted reproductive technology.辅助生殖技术中亲权的法律问题。
J Soc Issues. 2005 Mar;61(1):127-37. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-4537.2005.00397.x.
10
In re marriage of Buzzanca: trial court analysis.
West State Univ Law Rev. 1998;26:1-24.
引用本文的文献
1
Commercial Surrogacy: An Overview.商业代孕：概述。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Dec;44(12):1141-1158. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759774. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
Zotero 插件