Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Clin Chem. 2020 Mar 1;66(3):474-482. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa003.
Clinical LC-MS/MS assays traditionally require that samples be run in batches with calibration curves in each batch. This approach is inefficient and presents a barrier to random access analysis. We developed an alternative approach called multipoint internal calibration (MPIC) that eliminated the need for batch-mode analysis.
The new approach used 4 variants of 13C-labeled methotrexate (0.026-10.3 µM) as an internal calibration curve within each sample. One site carried out a comprehensive validation, which included an evaluation of interferences and matrix effects, lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), and 20-day precision. Three sites evaluated assay precision and linearity. MPIC was also compared with traditional LC-MS/MS and an immunoassay.
Recovery of spiked analyte was 93%-102%. The LLOQ was validated to be 0.017 µM. Total variability, determined in a 20-day experiment, was 11.5%CV. In a 5-day variability study performed at each site, total imprecision was 3.4 to 16.8%CV. Linearity was validated throughout the calibrator range (r2 > 0.995, slopes = 0.996-1.01). In comparing 40 samples run in each laboratory, the median interlaboratory imprecision was 6.55%CV. MPIC quantification was comparable to both traditional LC-MS/MS and immunoassay (r2 = 0.96-0.98, slopes = 1.04-1.06). Bland-Altman analysis of all comparisons showed biases rarely exceeding 20% when MTX concentrations were >0.4 µM.
The MPIC method for serum methotrexate quantification was validated in a multisite proof-of-concept study and represents a big step toward random-access LC-MS/MS analysis, which could change the paradigm of mass spectrometry in the clinical laboratory.
传统的临床 LC-MS/MS 分析需要在每个批次中运行样本,并在每个批次中建立校准曲线。这种方法效率低下,并且阻碍了随机访问分析。我们开发了一种替代方法,称为多点内标校准 (MPIC),该方法消除了批处理分析的需求。
该新方法在每个样本中使用 4 种 13C 标记的甲氨蝶呤 (0.026-10.3 μM) 变体作为内部校准曲线。一个地点进行了全面验证,包括对干扰和基质效应、定量下限 (LLOQ) 和 20 天精密度的评估。三个地点评估了分析的精密度和线性。还将 MPIC 与传统的 LC-MS/MS 和免疫测定进行了比较。
分析物的回收率为 93%-102%。LLOQ 验证为 0.017 μM。在 20 天的实验中确定的总变异性为 11.5%CV。在每个地点进行的为期 5 天的变异性研究中,总不精密度为 3.4%至 16.8%CV。线性在整个校准器范围内得到验证(r2>0.995,斜率=0.996-1.01)。在比较每个实验室运行的 40 个样本时,实验室间不精密度的中位数为 6.55%CV。MPIC 定量与传统的 LC-MS/MS 和免疫测定相当(r2=0.96-0.98,斜率=1.04-1.06)。所有比较的 Bland-Altman 分析显示,当 MTX 浓度>0.4 μM 时,偏差很少超过 20%。
该血清甲氨蝶呤定量的 MPIC 方法在多地点概念验证研究中得到验证,代表了向随机访问 LC-MS/MS 分析迈出的重要一步,这可能改变临床实验室中的质谱分析范式。