Suppr超能文献

分析 PhoPhiKat-45 的德语扩展形式:心理测量学特性、因素结构、与李克特版本的测量不变性以及自我-同伴收敛性。

Analyzing a German-language Expanded Form of the PhoPhiKat-45: Psychometric Properties, Factorial Structure, Measurement Invariance with the Likert-Version, and Self-Peer Convergence.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Assessment and Personality Psychology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):267-277. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1720699. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

Abstract

Personality assessment typically relies on self-report questionnaires utilizing Likert-type scales. Recently, the Expanded format has been proposed as alternative, but research on the consequences of adapting Likert-like responses to Expanded items is sparse. We adapt a multidimensional measure into the Expanded format: the PhoPhiKat-45. This is the standard questionnaire to assess gelotophobia (fear of being laughed at), gelotophilia (joy in being laughed at), and katagelasticism (joy in laughing at others). We test the reliability, item/scale parameters, and factorial structure across the Expanded and Likert formats in three independently collected samples (s = 323/261/460). While the psychometric properties are satisfying, elevated item- and mean-scores in our experimental Expanded version do not support full measurement invariance with the Likert version-and, thus, it does not permit the application of established cutoff scores for gelotophobia. The convergence of self-peer ratings supports the validity of an Expanded version. Overall, an Expanded form of the PhoPhiKat-45 did not outperform the standard Likert version. We discuss potential trait- and method-related causes for the measurement invariance and consequences for the usage of cutoff scores in the assessment of gelotophobia as well as interpreting the findings in light of continued research on the Expanded response format.

摘要

人格评估通常依赖于使用李克特量表的自我报告问卷。最近,扩展格式被提议作为替代方法,但关于将类似于李克特的反应适应为扩展项目的后果的研究很少。我们将多维测量方法改编为扩展格式:PhoPhiKat-45。这是评估恐笑症(害怕被嘲笑)、喜笑症(喜欢被嘲笑)和笑他性(喜欢嘲笑他人)的标准问卷。我们在三个独立收集的样本(s=323/261/460)中测试了扩展格式和李克特格式的可靠性、项目/量表参数和因子结构。虽然心理测量学特性令人满意,但我们的实验扩展版本中的项目和平均值得分较高,不支持与李克特版本的完全测量不变性,因此不允许使用既定的恐笑症截止分数。自我-同伴评分的一致性支持扩展版本的有效性。总体而言,PhoPhiKat-45 的扩展形式并没有优于标准李克特版本。我们讨论了测量不变性的潜在特质和方法相关原因,以及在评估恐笑症时使用截止分数的后果,并根据对扩展反应格式的持续研究来解释这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验