Suppr超能文献

健康决策中的确认偏误:来自 MMR 疫苗-自闭症争议的证据。

Confirmatory bias in health decisions: Evidence from the MMR-autism controversy.

机构信息

Fudan University, China.

Lehigh University, United States.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2020 Mar;70:102284. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102284. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

Abstract

Since Wakefield et al. (1998), the public was exposed to mixed information surrounding the claim that measles-mumps-rubella vaccine causes autism. A persistent trend to delay the vaccination during 1998-2011 in the US was driven by children of college-educated mothers, suggesting that these mothers held biases against the vaccine influenced by the early unfounded claim. Consistent with confirmatory bias, exposures to negative information about the vaccine strengthened their biases more than exposures to positive information attenuated them. Positive online information, however, had strong impacts on vaccination decisions, suggesting that online dissemination of vaccine-safety information may help tackle the sticky misinformation.

摘要

自韦克菲尔德等人(1998 年)以来,公众接触到了围绕麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹疫苗会导致自闭症这一说法的各种混杂信息。1998 年至 2011 年期间,美国持续出现了一种推迟接种疫苗的趋势,这一趋势的主要推动因素是接受过大学教育的母亲的孩子,这表明这些母亲受到了早期毫无根据的说法的影响,对疫苗存在偏见。与确认偏误一致的是,接触有关疫苗的负面信息会增强他们的偏见,而接触正面信息则会减弱他们的偏见。然而,正面的在线信息对疫苗接种决策有很大的影响,这表明在线传播疫苗安全信息可能有助于解决这种棘手的错误信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验