Department of Nuclear Medicine, Papageorgiou Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ring Road, Nea Efkarpia, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Laboratory of Medical Physics, AHEPA University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1 Stilponos Kyriakidi Str, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Mar;161:108079. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108079. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
To investigate the agreement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) determination between Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Cr-EDTA) plasma clearance (GFR) and Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Tc-DTPA) plasma clearance (GFR), the Gates Tc-DTPA renographic method (GFR) and the serum creatinine Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI, GFR) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Ninety-nine T2DM patients underwent GFR determinations simultaneously with Cr-EDTA and Tc-DTPA (using the slope-intercept technique and the Brochner-Mortensen correction) and also with GFR and GFR.
In the comparison between GFR versus GFR, GFR and GFR, the Bland-Altman statistic provided 0.0 ± 13.2, 17.4* ± 28.8 and -5.9* ± 30.1 (*p < 0.001 for the difference from 0). Lin's concordance correlation coefficient showed substantial (0.976), poor (0.737) and poor (0.872) agreement, respectively. The proportion of the index results within the 30% and 10% of GFR measurements were 95% and 74% for GFR, 53% and 19% for GFR, and 83% and 26% for GFR, respectively.
In T2DM patients, a clinically acceptable agreement is demonstrated between Cr-EDTA and Tc-DTPA plasma clearance for GFR measurements, suggesting conditional interchangeability between those compounds. Both the CKD-EPI prediction equation and the Gates' renographic method cannot assess GFR reliably, the latter appearing less unfailing than the former.
研究 2 型糖尿病患者中,用铬-乙二胺四乙酸(Cr-EDTA)血浆清除率(GFR)和锝-二乙三胺五乙酸(Tc-DTPA)血浆清除率(GFR)、Gates Tc-DTPA 肾图法(GFR)和血清肌酐慢性肾脏病流行病学合作方程(CKD-EPI,GFR)同时测定肾小球滤过率(GFR)的结果是否具有一致性。
99 例 2 型糖尿病患者同时进行 Cr-EDTA 和 Tc-DTPA(采用斜率截距法和 Brochner-Mortensen 校正)以及 GFR 和 GFR 的 GFR 测定。
在 GFR 与 GFR 、GFR 与 GFR 的比较中,Bland-Altman 统计量提供了 0.0±13.2、17.4*±28.8 和-5.9*±30.1(差值与 0 相比,p<0.001)。Lin 一致性相关系数分别显示为高度一致(0.976)、差(0.737)和差(0.872)。GFR 的指数结果在 GFR 测量的 30%和 10%范围内的比例分别为 95%和 74%,GFR 的比例分别为 53%和 19%,GFR 的比例分别为 83%和 26%。
在 2 型糖尿病患者中,Cr-EDTA 和 Tc-DTPA 血浆清除率测定 GFR 具有临床可接受的一致性,提示这两种化合物具有条件互换性。CKD-EPI 预测方程和 Gates 肾图法均不能可靠地评估 GFR,后者的可靠性似乎不如前者。