• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的Meta 分析。

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the management of advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang City, China.

出版信息

Anticancer Drugs. 2020 Jul;31(6):637-645. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000921.

DOI:10.1097/CAD.0000000000000921
PMID:32058346
Abstract

This study is a meta-analysis assessing the safety and efficacy of programmed cell death-1/cell death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors in order to improve their efficacy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We retrieved studies of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer from electronic databases; 17 clinical trials were analyzed. The pooled hazard ratios for overall and progression-free survival (PFS), and the odds ratios (ORs) for the objective response rate (ORR) and adverse effects were calculated using Review Manager 5.3. The pooled hazard ratios for overall and PFS were 0.69 and 0.74, respectively, and the pooled OR for the ORR was 1.78, implying a significant improvement in overall survival (OS), PFS, and ORR with administration of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. In subgroup analysis, the ORs of the ORR were 2.48 in PD-L1 positive versus negative tumors, and 0.99 for a high dose of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors versus a low dose. The ORs for the occurrence of any treatment-related adverse effects and grades 3-5 treatment-related adverse effects were 0.33 and 0.30, respectively, suggesting a good safety profile. PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy has superior outcomes in terms of the ORR, OS, and PFS with tolerable adverse effects when compared with chemotherapy.

摘要

本研究是一项荟萃分析,旨在评估程序性细胞死亡蛋白 1/细胞死亡配体 1(PD-1/PD-L1)抑制剂的安全性和有效性,以提高其在晚期非小细胞肺癌中的疗效。我们从电子数据库中检索了抗 PD-1/PD-L1 治疗非小细胞肺癌的研究,共分析了 17 项临床试验。使用 Review Manager 5.3 计算总生存期和无进展生存期(PFS)的合并风险比(HR)、客观缓解率(ORR)和不良反应的比值比(OR)。总生存期和 PFS 的合并 HR 分别为 0.69 和 0.74,ORR 的合并 OR 为 1.78,这表明 PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂的给药可显著改善总生存期(OS)、PFS 和 ORR。亚组分析显示,PD-L1 阳性肿瘤与阴性肿瘤的 ORR 分别为 2.48 和 0.99,高剂量 PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂与低剂量的 ORR 分别为 2.48 和 0.99。任何治疗相关不良反应和 3-5 级治疗相关不良反应的发生率的 OR 分别为 0.33 和 0.30,这表明其具有良好的安全性。与化疗相比,PD-1/PD-L1 免疫疗法在 ORR、OS 和 PFS 方面具有更好的疗效,且不良反应可耐受。

相似文献

1
Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the management of advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a meta-analysis.免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的Meta 分析。
Anticancer Drugs. 2020 Jul;31(6):637-645. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000921.
2
Safety and Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with radiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂联合放疗治疗非小细胞肺癌患者的安全性和疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2021 Feb;10(4):1222-1239. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3718. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
3
Anti-PD1 versus anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.抗 PD-1 与抗 PD-L1 免疫疗法在晚期非小细胞肺癌一线治疗中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thorac Cancer. 2021 Apr;12(7):1058-1066. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13867. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
4
Predictive effect of PD-L1 expression for immune checkpoint inhibitor (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors) treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)表达对免疫检查点抑制剂(PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂)治疗非小细胞肺癌的预测作用:一项荟萃分析。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2020 Mar;80:106214. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106214. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
5
Predictors of Survival Benefit From Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.预测晚期非小细胞肺癌患者免疫检查点抑制剂生存获益的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 Mar;21(2):106-113.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.11.004. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Response Rate and Survival at Key Timepoints With PD-1 Blockade vs Chemotherapy in PD-L1 Subgroups: Meta-Analysis of Metastatic NSCLC Trials.PD-1 阻断与化疗在 PD-L1 亚组中的关键时间点的反应率和生存:转移性 NSCLC 试验的荟萃分析。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Jan 27;5(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab012. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
The optimal immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.最优免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2021 Jun;23(6):1117-1127. doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02502-8. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
8
Comparative efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy versus immunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis of randomized trials.化疗免疫治疗与免疫治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效比较:随机试验的网络荟萃分析。
Cancer. 2021 Mar 1;127(5):709-719. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33269. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
9
Anti-PD-1/L1-associated immune-related adverse events as harbinger of favorable clinical outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis.抗 PD-1/L1 相关免疫相关不良事件预示着良好的临床结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2021 Jan;23(1):100-109. doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02397-5. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
10
Effectivity and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for different level of PD-L1-positive, advanced NSCLC: A meta-analysis of 4939 patients from randomized controlled trials.不同 PD-L1 阳性表达水平的晚期 NSCLC 患者接受 PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂治疗的有效性和安全性:来自随机对照试验的 4939 例患者的荟萃分析。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2020 Jul;84:106452. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106452. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Atezolizumab induced immune-related adverse event mimicking conjunctival metastatic disease.阿替利珠单抗诱发了类似结膜转移性疾病的免疫相关不良事件。
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2022 Mar 16;26:101489. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101489. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Ocular Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Cancer.肺癌免疫检查点抑制剂相关的眼部免疫相关不良事件。
Front Immunol. 2021 Aug 24;12:701951. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.701951. eCollection 2021.
3
Attitudes and Practices of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Chinese Patients With Cancer: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.
中国癌症患者对免疫检查点抑制剂的态度及实践:一项全国性横断面调查
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Mar 22;12:583126. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.583126. eCollection 2021.