Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 13;10(2):e033034. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033034.
Enhancing the active involvement of clients as co-researchers is seen as a promising innovation in quality research. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and usability of five qualitative instruments used by co-researchers for assessing the quality of care relationships in long-term care.
A qualitative evaluation was performed in three care organisations each focused on one of the following three client groups: frail older adults, people with mental health problems and people with intellectual disabilities. A total of 140 respondents participated in this study. The data comprised observations by researchers and experiences from co-researchers, clients and professionals.
Two instruments scored best on feasibility and usability and can therefore both be used by co-researchers to monitor the quality of care relationships from the client perspective in long-term care.
The selected instruments let co-researchers interview other clients about their experiences with care relationships. The study findings are useful for long-term care organisations and client councils who are willing to give clients an active role in quality improvement.
增强客户作为共同研究者的积极参与被视为提高研究质量的一项有前途的创新。本研究旨在评估五位共同研究者用于评估长期护理中护理关系质量的五种定性工具的可行性和可用性。
在三个护理组织中进行了定性评估,每个组织都专注于以下三个客户群体之一:体弱的老年人、有心理健康问题的人和智障人士。共有 140 名受访者参加了这项研究。数据包括研究人员的观察和共同研究者、客户和专业人员的经验。
有两种工具在可行性和可用性方面得分最高,因此共同研究者可以使用这两种工具从客户的角度监测长期护理中的护理关系质量。
选定的工具允许共同研究者采访其他客户有关他们对护理关系的体验。研究结果对愿意让客户在质量改进中发挥积极作用的长期护理组织和客户委员会很有用。