Department of Interventional Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 May;49(4):527-532. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02054-2.
There were limited studies comparing the anterior (AC) and posterior (PC) circulation acute ischemic strokes (AIS). Our study aimed to evaluate distinct features of AC and PC strokes regarding clinical, vascular risk, pathogenesis and outcome factors after endovascular procedures. This multicenter prospective study registered 873 patients with acute large occlusion of anterior circulation stroke (ACS) and posterior circulation stroke (PCS). Patients who underwent endovascular procedures were included in this study. The differences in ACS and PCS regarding baseline characteristics, post-operative intracranial hemorrhage and outcomes were evaluated. A total of 741 patients were included in the data analysis. Intravenous thrombolysis (31.5%), atrial fibrillation (22.7%) and stent thrombectomy (82.4%) were more frequently observed in ACS patients. While higher NIHSS score, hypertension (67.6%) and balloon angioplasty (20.7%) were more prevalent in PCS patients. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was more common in ACS (7.4% vs 2.8%). However, a 3-month follow-up outcomes were better in ACS with higher functional independence and low mortality rate than PCS (46.8% vs 30.3% and 16.4% vs 33.8%, respectively, P < 0.01). In this large prospective study, there were significant differences in the pathogenesis of stroke and treatment procedure between ACS and PCS which influence the clinical outcome. These findings could lead to a tailored clinical procedures and treatment strategies to improve the prognosis in both groups.
本研究旨在评估血管内治疗后前循环(AC)和后循环(PC)急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者在临床、血管风险、发病机制和结局方面的不同特征。这是一项多中心前瞻性研究,共纳入 873 例急性前循环大血管闭塞性卒中(ACS)和后循环大血管闭塞性卒中(PCS)患者。纳入接受血管内治疗的患者。评估了 ACS 和 PCS 患者在基线特征、术后颅内出血和结局方面的差异。共有 741 例患者纳入数据分析。ACS 患者更常接受静脉溶栓治疗(31.5%)、心房颤动(22.7%)和支架取栓术(82.4%)。而 PCS 患者 NIHSS 评分更高(67.6%)、高血压(67.6%)和球囊血管成形术(20.7%)更为常见。ACS 患者症状性颅内出血更常见(7.4% vs. 2.8%)。然而,3 个月随访时 ACS 患者的结局更好,功能独立性更高,死亡率更低(46.8% vs. 30.3%和 16.4% vs. 33.8%,均 P < 0.01)。在这项大型前瞻性研究中,ACS 和 PCS 之间的卒中发病机制和治疗方法存在显著差异,这影响了临床结局。这些发现可能导致为两组患者制定个体化的临床治疗方案和策略,以改善预后。