St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Cytopathology. 2020 May;31(3):208-214. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12811. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a routine sampling method in the diagnostic work up of salivary gland lesions. Despite universal use, no standardised classification existed for the cytopathological reporting of such entities until recently. The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) aims to standardise the reporting of these lesions, offering risk of malignancy rates and clinical management recommendations.
We retrospectively applied MSRSGC to cases reported over a 5-year period. Salivary FNA specimens were reclassified according to the MSRSGC as (I) non-diagnostic, (II) non-neoplastic, (III) atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), (IV) benign neoplasm and salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, (V) suspicious for malignancy, and (VI) malignant. Cases with surgical resections were documented and risk of malignancy calculated for each group, where possible. We compared our outcomes with similar studies performed since publication of the Milan criteria.
In total, 192 specimens were reassigned as non-diagnostic (n = 30), non-neoplastic (n = 31), AUS (n = 1), benign neoplasm (n = 97) and salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (n = 4), suspicious for malignancy (n = 3), and malignant (n = 26). There were 73 surgical resections. Our calculated risk of malignancy was within the proposed MSRSGC rates for the non-diagnostic, benign neoplasm and malignant groups. One AUS case did not undergo surgery. Benign and malignant sensitivities and specificities for the original reporting categories were 88.24% and 95.72%, and 100% and 95.45% for the MSRSGC, respectively.
Salivary gland FNA has high diagnostic accuracy and the MSRSGC offers standardised reporting and assistance in the stratification of cases. This may improve communication between pathologists and clinicians with improved outcomes for patients.
细针抽吸(FNA)是唾液腺病变诊断工作中的常规取样方法。尽管普遍使用,但直到最近才为这些实体的细胞病理学报告制定了标准化分类。米兰唾液腺细胞学报告系统(MSRSGC)旨在标准化这些病变的报告,提供恶性肿瘤风险率和临床管理建议。
我们回顾性地将 MSRSGC 应用于在 5 年期间报告的病例。根据 MSRSGC 将唾液 FNA 标本重新分类为(I)非诊断性、(II)非肿瘤性、(III)意义未确定的非典型性(AUS)、(IV)良性肿瘤和唾液腺肿瘤具有不确定的恶性潜能、(V)疑似恶性和(VI)恶性。记录有手术切除的病例,并尽可能计算每个组的恶性肿瘤风险。我们将我们的结果与米兰标准发表后的类似研究进行了比较。
共有 192 个标本被重新归类为非诊断性(n=30)、非肿瘤性(n=31)、AUS(n=1)、良性肿瘤(n=97)和唾液腺肿瘤具有不确定的恶性潜能(n=4)、疑似恶性(n=3)和恶性(n=26)。有 73 例手术切除。我们计算的恶性肿瘤风险与非诊断性、良性肿瘤和恶性肿瘤组的 MSRSGC 提出的风险率相符。一个 AUS 病例未进行手术。原始报告分类的良性和恶性的敏感性和特异性分别为 88.24%和 95.72%,MSRSGC 分别为 100%和 95.45%。
唾液腺 FNA 具有很高的诊断准确性,MSRSGC 提供了标准化的报告,并有助于病例分层。这可能会改善病理学家和临床医生之间的沟通,从而改善患者的预后。