Suppr超能文献

在放射科医生协助下,细胞病理学家对甲状腺外头颈部病变进行细针穿刺细胞学检查的诊断准确性:一项单中心研究。

Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for extrathyroidal head-and-neck lesions performed by a cytopathologist with the assistance of radiologist: A single-center study.

作者信息

Bayrak Busra Yaprak, Paksoy Nadir

机构信息

Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Kocaeli, Izmit, Kocaeli, Türkiye (Turkey).

Private Cytopathology/Fine Needle Aspiration Practice, Izmit, Kocaeli, Türkiye (Turkey).

出版信息

Cytojournal. 2025 Jun 2;22:57. doi: 10.25259/Cytojournal_247_2024. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In recent years, several publications have described the use of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) by cytopathologists to achieve better diagnostic accuracy. Some cytopathologists enroll in courses to learn and apply ultrasound (US) guidance themselves. However, no standard procedure has been established that cytopathologists can follow to perform US for FNA. Alternatively, FNA can be a useful tool when cytopathologists collaborate with radiologists. Here, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FNA for non-thyroidal head-and-neck masses retrieved by a cytopathologist with US guidance provided by a radiologist.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The FNA results for non-thyroidal head-and-neck masses at a private clinic using the Scandinavian FNA model with radiologist‒cytopathologist collaboration were compared with the histopathology results.

RESULTS

In all, 1890 patients who underwent FNA were identified, among whom 1435 (76%) also had histopathological results. Non-cystic lesions were obtained from lymph nodes (LNs), salivary glands, and soft tissue, while the other lesions were cystic in nature. For FNA, the accuracy was 99.4%, the sensitivity was 99.6%, the specificity was 99.3%, the positive predictive value was 99.3%, and the negative predictive value was 99.6%. No FNA results were non-diagnostic. Surgical follow-up revealed that only eight of the 1435 assessments (0.5%), all performed for LN lesions, yielded false-negative or false-positive results.

CONCLUSION

The present study is based on single-center observations. The use of FNA, when performed by a specialized cytopathologist and with US assistance from a radiologist, produces accurate results and sufficient material for analysis, especially for LNs in extrathyroidal head-and-neck lesions. This study also reveals that the technique is a low-cost and effective process. The way in which FNA is presented here indicates that this procedure would be useful and ideal for any health service.

摘要

目的

近年来,有几篇文献描述了细胞病理学家使用超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术(FNA)以提高诊断准确性。一些细胞病理学家参加课程自学并应用超声(US)引导。然而,尚未建立细胞病理学家在进行FNA时可遵循的超声操作标准程序。另外,当细胞病理学家与放射科医生合作时,FNA可能是一种有用的工具。在此,我们旨在评估在放射科医生提供的超声引导下,细胞病理学家对非甲状腺头颈部肿块进行FNA的诊断准确性。

材料与方法

将一家私人诊所采用斯堪的纳维亚FNA模型并通过放射科医生与细胞病理学家合作对非甲状腺头颈部肿块进行FNA的结果与组织病理学结果进行比较。

结果

总共确定了1890例行FNA的患者,其中1435例(76%)也有组织病理学结果。非囊性病变取自淋巴结(LNs)、唾液腺和软组织,而其他病变本质上是囊性的。对于FNA,准确率为99.4%,敏感性为99.6%,特异性为99.3%,阳性预测值为99.3%,阴性预测值为99.6%。没有FNA结果无法诊断。手术随访显示,在1435例评估中,只有8例(0.5%)均针对LN病变,产生了假阴性或假阳性结果。

结论

本研究基于单中心观察。由专业细胞病理学家进行FNA并在放射科医生的超声辅助下,能产生准确的结果和足够的分析材料,特别是对于甲状腺外头颈部病变中的LNs。本研究还表明该技术是一种低成本且有效的方法。此处呈现的FNA方式表明该程序对任何医疗服务都将是有用且理想的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4932/12289109/82e097ba88c0/Cytojournal-22-57-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验