Wall Lindley B, Velicki Katherine, Roberts Summer, Goldfarb Charles A
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.
J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Aug;45(8):773.e1-773.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.12.005. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
Full-thickness skin grafts are classically used for areas of skin deficit in syndactyly reconstruction surgery. However, skin grafting requires additional time under anesthesia and includes donor site morbidity. Synthetic dermal substitute has produced favorable web creep and scar appearance outcomes in syndactyly reconstruction. We sought to validate these results using objective outcome measures.
All patients who had undergone syndactyly reconstruction with synthetic dermal substitute with 1-year follow-up were identified. We included 23 webs in 16 patients; 2 were lost to follow-up. Median age at surgery was 27 months; 7 patients were female. Five webs were revision surgeries. Two patients had a diagnosis of amniotic constriction band, and 3 had symbrachydactyly. All webs were assessed from blinded clinical photos. Outcome measures included web creep assessment (range, 0-5) and Vancouver Scar Scale.
Of 21 webs, 2 had minimal creep and 16 had none; 3 had clinically relevant creep (grade 2). Vancouver Scar Scale scores for all webs averaged 1.19 (0 is normal). There was normal vascularity in 20 webs, pigmentation was normal in 17 webs, skin pliability was normal in 13 webs, and scar height was flat in 15 webs. On the visual analog scale assessment, surgeons rated the appearance of the 21 webs as an average of 8.8 (range, 5-10). There were no postoperative complications.
Synthetic dermal substitute is an effective, efficient, and visually satisfactory option for coverage of skin deficits in syndactyly reconstruction. The current heterogeneous sample revealed that this approach can provide satisfactory outcomes for patients, families, and surgeons. Although no surgical complications were noted, the rate of integration and healing has yet to be determined.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
全厚皮片传统上用于并指重建手术中皮肤缺损的部位。然而,植皮需要在麻醉下额外花费时间,并且存在供区并发症。合成真皮替代物在并指重建中产生了良好的蹼状间隙伸展和瘢痕外观效果。我们试图使用客观的结果指标来验证这些结果。
确定所有接受合成真皮替代物并指重建且随访1年的患者。我们纳入了16例患者的23个蹼状间隙;2例失访。手术时的中位年龄为27个月;7例为女性。5个蹼状间隙为翻修手术。2例患者诊断为羊膜束带综合征,3例为短指畸形。所有蹼状间隙均根据盲法临床照片进行评估。结果指标包括蹼状间隙伸展评估(范围0 - 5)和温哥华瘢痕量表。
在21个蹼状间隙中,2个有最小伸展,16个无伸展;3个有临床相关伸展(2级)。所有蹼状间隙的温哥华瘢痕量表评分平均为1.19(0为正常)。20个蹼状间隙血管正常,17个色素沉着正常,13个皮肤柔韧性正常,15个瘢痕高度平坦。在视觉模拟量表评估中,外科医生对21个蹼状间隙外观的评分平均为8.8(范围5 - 10)。无术后并发症。
合成真皮替代物是并指重建中覆盖皮肤缺损的一种有效、高效且视觉效果令人满意的选择。目前的异质性样本表明,这种方法可为患者、家属和外科医生提供满意的结果。尽管未观察到手术并发症,但整合和愈合率尚未确定。
研究类型/证据水平:治疗性IV级。