Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Boston Shoulder Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7):1450-1459. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.11.011. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
The management of glenoid deformity during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty remains controversial. In this study, we evaluate variable correction of glenoid deformity by eccentric reaming. We hypothesize that partial correction of modified Walch B/C-type glenoid deformities can achieve 75% bone-implant contact area (BICA) with a reduced vault perforation risk compared with complete correction.
Fifty shoulder computed tomographic scans with glenohumeral osteoarthritis were retrospectively evaluated. The Tornier BluePrint v2.1.5 software simulated 3 eccentric reaming scenarios including no, partial, and complete deformity correction. Each scenario was evaluated at 4 BICAs and using 3 implant fixation types. Three-dimensional surface representations were used to evaluate medialization and vault perforation.
The patients had mean glenoid retroversion and inclination of 18.5° and 8.8°, respectively, and mean posterior humeral head subluxation of 76%. With 75% BICA, the 3 fixation types had glenoid vault perforation in 6%-26% and 26%-54% of cases for partial and complete glenoid deformity correction, respectively. The central and posterior-inferior implant components were most likely to perforate across all scenarios.
Eccentric reaming for glenoid deformity correction increases the risk of vault perforation. Severe glenoid deformity required increased medialization to achieve 75% BICA. Pegged implants have increased chances of perforation compared with a keeled design; the central and posterior-inferior components were most likely to perforate during deformity correction.
Partial deformity correction of modified Walch B/C-type glenoid deformities can achieve 75% BICA while reducing the risk of vault perforation compared with complete correction at the time of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
在解剖型全肩关节置换术中,肩胛盂畸形的处理仍存在争议。本研究通过偏心扩孔评估肩胛盂畸形的可变矫正。我们假设与完全矫正相比,改良 Walch B/C 型肩胛盂畸形的部分矫正可以达到 75%的骨-假体接触面积(BICA),同时降低骨顶穿孔的风险。
回顾性评估 50 例肩关节炎的肩关节 CT 扫描。Tornier BluePrint v2.1.5 软件模拟了 3 种偏心扩孔情况,包括无、部分和完全畸形矫正。每种情况在 4 个 BICA 和 3 种假体固定类型下进行评估。使用三维表面表示来评估内侧化和骨顶穿孔。
患者肩胛盂后倾和倾斜分别为 18.5°和 8.8°,肱骨头后脱位为 76%。在 75%BICA 时,3 种固定类型的部分和完全肩胛盂畸形矫正的骨顶穿孔率分别为 6%-26%和 26%-54%。在所有情况下,中心和后下的假体部件最有可能穿孔。
偏心扩孔矫正肩胛盂畸形会增加骨顶穿孔的风险。严重的肩胛盂畸形需要增加内侧化才能达到 75%BICA。与有槽设计相比,带钉假体穿孔的可能性增加;在畸形矫正过程中,中心和后下的部件最有可能穿孔。
与解剖型全肩关节置换术中完全矫正相比,改良 Walch B/C 型肩胛盂畸形的部分矫正可以达到 75%BICA,同时降低骨顶穿孔的风险。