Studenski Matthew T, Patel Nirav V, Markoe Arnold, Harbour J William, Samuels Stuart E
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL.
Brachytherapy. 2020 Mar-Apr;19(2):249-254. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
A common treatment planning technique for eye plaque brachytherapy is to model the tumor as an ellipse. For posterior tumors near the optic disc and fovea, this approach may lead to overlap between tumor and the organ at risk (OAR). We hypothesized that a superior plan can be generated by modeling the actual tumor shape.
Forty eye plaque patients with tumors <1 cm from the optic disc and fovea were selected. Two treatment plans were generated for each patient: an elliptical tumor model plan and a true tumor model plan. Dosimetric data were collected for each plan, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to asses any statistically significant differences.
Equivalent tumor coverage was confirmed between the elliptical and true tumor plans for all patients. Qualitative analysis showed greater dosimetric differences between plans as the distance from the OARs increased from 0 to 2 mm but the largest differences were observed between 2 and 4 mm. Minimal differences between models were seen beyond 4 mm. Statistically significant dosimetric improvements were found for tumors <4 mm from the fovea and <2 mm from the optic disc.
Intuitively, accurate modeling of the tumor accounting for irregularities in the shape should result in a more conformal plan and an overall reduction in OAR dose. However, this technique is only beneficial for tumors that are within 4 mm of the fovea or optic disc. An elliptical tumor model allows for an acceptable plan unless the tumor is located posteriorly and has an irregular shape.
眼部敷贴近距离放射治疗的一种常见治疗计划技术是将肿瘤建模为椭圆。对于靠近视盘和黄斑中心凹的后部肿瘤,这种方法可能导致肿瘤与危及器官(OAR)重叠。我们假设通过对实际肿瘤形状进行建模可以生成更好的治疗计划。
选择40例肿瘤距视盘和黄斑中心凹小于1 cm的眼部敷贴患者。为每位患者生成两个治疗计划:一个椭圆肿瘤模型计划和一个真实肿瘤模型计划。收集每个计划的剂量学数据,并使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验评估是否存在任何统计学上的显著差异。
所有患者的椭圆肿瘤计划和真实肿瘤计划之间均证实了等效的肿瘤覆盖。定性分析表明,随着距OAR的距离从0增加到2 mm,计划之间的剂量学差异更大,但在2至4 mm之间观察到最大差异。超过4 mm时,模型之间的差异最小。对于距黄斑中心凹小于4 mm且距视盘小于2 mm的肿瘤,发现有统计学意义的剂量学改善。
直观地讲,考虑形状不规则性对肿瘤进行准确建模应能产生更适形的计划并总体降低OAR剂量。然而,这种技术仅对距黄斑中心凹或视盘4 mm以内的肿瘤有益。除非肿瘤位于后部且形状不规则,否则椭圆肿瘤模型可提供可接受的计划。