• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

球囊主动脉瓣成形术作为主动脉瓣置换术的桥梁:当代全国视角。

Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty as a Bridge to Aortic Valve Replacement: A Contemporary Nationwide Perspective.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 9;13(5):583-591. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.041. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.041
PMID:32061604
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to use a national representative database to assess the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as a bridge to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in contemporary practice.

BACKGROUND

Nationwide data on the use and outcomes of BAV as a bridge to TAVR are limited.

METHODS

Patients who underwent BAV between January and June in 2015 and 2016 were identified in the National Readmission Database. We assessed rate of subsequent TAVR following BAV, and predictors and timing of subsequent TAVR. We then identified a group of patients who had direct TAVR (without prior BAV) in the original 2015 to 2016 National Readmission Database dataset. We compared in-hospital outcomes following TAVR between patients with prior bridging BAV and those undergoing direct TAVR.

RESULTS

Among the 3,691 included patients 1,426 (38.6%) had subsequent TAVR. Timing of TAVR was pre-discharge in 7.4%, within 30 days in 35%, between 31 and 90 days in 47%, between 91 and 180 days in 14%, and >180 days in 4%. Negative predictors of subsequent TAVR included prior defibrillator (odds ratio [OR]: 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36 to 0.85), dementia (OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.79), malnutrition (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.90), and malignancy (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.82). In propensity-score matched cohorts of patients who underwent direct TAVR versus those with prior BAV, in-hospital mortality during TAVR admission was similar (3.7% vs. 3.5%; p = 0.91). Major complications, length of stay, and discharge disposition were also comparable. However, cost of the hospitalization was higher in the direct TAVR group.

CONCLUSIONS

About 40% of BAV patients undergo subsequent TAVR mostly within 90 days. In-hospital outcomes of TAVR in these patients were comparable with propensity-score matched patients who underwent TAVR without prior BAV. Further investigations are needed to define the role of BAV in contemporary practice.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在利用全国代表性数据库评估在当代实践中,经皮球囊主动脉瓣成形术(BAV)作为经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)桥接的发生率、预测因素和结果。

背景

关于 BAV 作为 TAVR 桥接的使用和结果的全国数据有限。

方法

在 2015 年 1 月至 6 月和 2016 年期间,国家再入院数据库中确定了接受 BAV 的患者。我们评估了 BAV 后随后进行 TAVR 的比率,以及随后进行 TAVR 的预测因素和时间。然后,我们在原始 2015 年至 2016 年国家再入院数据库数据集中确定了一组直接接受 TAVR(无先前 BAV)的患者。我们比较了有先前搭桥 BAV 的患者和直接接受 TAVR 的患者的 TAVR 后的住院期间结局。

结果

在 3691 名纳入患者中,有 1426 名(38.6%)随后进行了 TAVR。TAVR 的时间为出院前 7.4%,30 天内 35%,31 至 90 天内 47%,91 至 180 天内 14%,>180 天内 4%。随后 TAVR 的负预测因素包括先前的除颤器(比值比 [OR]:0.56;95%置信区间 [CI]:0.36 至 0.85)、痴呆(OR:0.60;95%CI:0.46 至 0.79)、营养不良(OR:0.64;95%CI:0.45 至 0.90)和恶性肿瘤(OR:0.62;95%CI:0.47 至 0.82)。在直接接受 TAVR 与先前接受 BAV 的患者的倾向评分匹配队列中,TAVR 住院期间的院内死亡率相似(3.7% vs. 3.5%;p=0.91)。主要并发症、住院时间和出院去向也相似。然而,直接 TAVR 组的住院费用更高。

结论

约 40%的 BAV 患者在 90 天内接受随后的 TAVR。这些患者的 TAVR 住院期间结局与接受无先前 BAV 的 TAVR 的倾向评分匹配患者相似。需要进一步研究来确定 BAV 在当代实践中的作用。

相似文献

1
Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty as a Bridge to Aortic Valve Replacement: A Contemporary Nationwide Perspective.球囊主动脉瓣成形术作为主动脉瓣置换术的桥梁:当代全国视角。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 9;13(5):583-591. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.041. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
2
Prior Balloon Valvuloplasty Versus Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the DIRECTAVI Trial.经皮球囊瓣膜成形术与直接经导管主动脉瓣置换术的比较:DIRECTAVI 试验结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 9;13(5):594-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.12.006.
3
Clinical and hemodynamic results after direct transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus pre-implantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty: A case-matched analysis.直接经导管主动脉瓣置换术与植入前球囊主动脉瓣成形术后的临床和血流动力学结果:病例匹配分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 1;90(5):809-816. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26671. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
4
Outcomes of Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Without Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Using a New Generation Valve.使用新一代瓣膜进行无球囊主动脉瓣成形术的直接经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结果
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Dec;20(12):1100-1104. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
5
Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty: A National Perspective.球囊主动脉瓣成形术相关的发病率和死亡率:国家视角。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004481.
6
Pre-Dilatation Versus No Pre-Dilatation for Implantation of a Self-Expanding Valve in All Comers Undergoing TAVR: The DIRECT Trial.直接研究:在所有接受 TAVR 的患者中,自膨式瓣膜植入前行预扩张与不行预扩张的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 22;12(8):767-777. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
7
Utility of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation era.球囊主动脉瓣成形术在经导管主动脉瓣植入时代的效用。
Open Heart. 2020 Apr;7(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001208.
8
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in bicuspid compared to trileaflet aortic valves.与三叶主动脉瓣相比,二叶主动脉瓣经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结果。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Jan;20(1):50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
9
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty bridge to transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with worse in-hospital mortality.球囊主动脉瓣成形术桥接经导管主动脉瓣置换术与住院期间死亡率升高相关。
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Oct 15;413:132348. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132348. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
10
In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in non-teaching hospitals.非教学医院经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的院内转归。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):954-962. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27968. Epub 2018 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Saudi Heart Association/National Heart Center/Saudi Arabian Cardiac Interventional Society/Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons/Saudi Cardiac Imaging Group 2023 TAVI Guidelines.沙特心脏协会/国家心脏中心/沙特阿拉伯心脏介入学会/沙特心脏外科医生协会/沙特心脏影像小组2023年经导管主动脉瓣置入术指南
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 15;36(2):184-231. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1379. eCollection 2024.
2
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Score for Readmissions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后再入院的机器学习评分的开发与验证
JACC Adv. 2022 Aug 26;1(3):100060. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100060. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Acute advanced aortic stenosis.
急性重度主动脉瓣狭窄。
Heart Fail Rev. 2023 Sep;28(5):1101-1111. doi: 10.1007/s10741-023-10312-7. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
4
Ballooning aortic stenosis before urgent non-cardiac surgery- zest for action or necessity?非心脏急诊手术前的主动脉瓣球囊扩张术——是积极行动还是必要之举?
EuroIntervention. 2021 Oct 1;17(8):e616-e617. doi: 10.4244/EIJV17I8A111.