• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痔切除术后疼痛缓解检查表对疼痛结局的影响:一项随机对照试验

Impact of post-haemorrhoidectomy pain relief checklists on pain outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Huang Johnny, Rickard Matthew J F X, Keshava Anil, Suen Michael K L

机构信息

Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, The University of Sydney, Concord Clinical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2020 Apr;90(4):580-584. doi: 10.1111/ans.15732. Epub 2020 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1111/ans.15732
PMID:32062860
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Haemorrhoidectomy is associated with significant post-operative pain which is primarily managed pharmacologically. Whether a non-pharmacological adjunct such as a checklist can improve pain outcomes after an open haemorrhoidectomy has yet to be studied. The purpose of this study was to determine if a patient-completed checklist of prescribed post-haemorrhoidectomy pain medications would improve pain management after surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a dual-centre randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing a Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic third or fourth degree haemorrhoids. Thirty-five patients were randomized into either a control group which received post-operative pain medication plus a visual analogue scale (VAS) form, or an intervention group which received a post-operative medication checklist in addition to the items the control group received. Both groups recorded their pain levels on the VAS forms at 10.00, 14.00 and 20.00 hours each day for 14 days post-operatively.

RESULTS

Patients in the checklist group reported a significantly greater reduction in mean VAS pain score of 2.51 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34-3.68; P < 0.001) between day 1 post-op and day 14 post-op compared to 1.86 (95% CI 0.77-2.95; P = 0.001) for the control group. There was no significant difference between mean pain experienced by patients in either group over each of the 14 days individually or overall (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

The pain medication checklist lead to a greater reduction in pain between day 1 and 14 after an open haemorrhoidectomy compared to standard care but did not significantly reduce mean pain across any individual days or overall.

摘要

背景

痔切除术会导致严重的术后疼痛,主要通过药物治疗。诸如检查表之类的非药物辅助手段能否改善开放式痔切除术后的疼痛结局,尚无研究。本研究的目的是确定患者完成的痔切除术后规定止痛药物检查表是否能改善术后疼痛管理。

方法

我们对因有症状的三度或四度痔疮接受Milligan-Morgan痔切除术的患者进行了一项双中心随机对照试验。35名患者被随机分为对照组,接受术后止痛药物加视觉模拟量表(VAS)表格,或干预组,除接受对照组的项目外,还接受术后药物检查表。两组患者在术后14天内每天10:00、14:00和20:00在VAS表格上记录疼痛程度。

结果

检查表组患者术后第1天至第14天的平均VAS疼痛评分显著降低2.51(95%置信区间(CI)1.34 - 3.68;P < 0.001),而对照组为1.86(95%CI 0.77 - 2.95;P = 0.001)。两组患者在14天中任何一天或总体上经历的平均疼痛无显著差异(P = 0.07)。

结论

与标准护理相比,痔切除术后疼痛药物检查表在术后第1天至第14天能更大程度地减轻疼痛,但在任何一天或总体上均未显著降低平均疼痛程度。

相似文献

1
Impact of post-haemorrhoidectomy pain relief checklists on pain outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.痔切除术后疼痛缓解检查表对疼痛结局的影响:一项随机对照试验
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Apr;90(4):580-584. doi: 10.1111/ans.15732. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
2
Randomized single-blind clinical trial of intradermal methylene blue on pain reduction after open diathermy haemorrhoidectomy.亚甲蓝皮内注射用于开放透热疗法痔切除术后减轻疼痛的随机单盲临床试验
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Aug;16(8):O283-7. doi: 10.1111/codi.12587.
3
Comparison of Pedicle Coagulation Hemorrhoidectomy With LigaSure Versus Conventional Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy in Reducing Post-operative Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.使用LigaSure的痔上黏膜环切术与传统Milligan Morgan痔切除术在减轻术后疼痛方面的比较:一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2023 Sep 11;15(9):e45015. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45015. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Study Protocol for the Use of Conventional Open Haemorrhoidectomy versus Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty in the Treatment of Symptomatic Haemorrhoids: A Randomized Controlled Trial.常规开放式痔切除术与激光痔切除术治疗症状性痔的研究方案:一项随机对照试验。
Eur Surg Res. 2020;61(6):201-208. doi: 10.1159/000513844. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
5
Dearterialization with mucopexy versus haemorrhoidectomy for grade III or IV haemorrhoids: short-term results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.用于治疗III级或IV级痔疮的黏膜固定去动脉化术与痔切除术:一项双盲随机对照试验的短期结果
Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(10):1281-8. doi: 10.1111/codi.12303.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of metronidazole in post-haemorrhoidectomy pain relief.系统评价和荟萃分析甲硝唑在痔术后缓解疼痛中的作用。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Sep;19(9):803-811. doi: 10.1111/codi.13755.
7
COMPARISON OF OPEN AND CLOSED TECHNIQUES OF HAEMORRHOIDECTOMY IN TERMS OF POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS.痔切除术开放与闭合技术术后并发症的比较
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2015 Oct-Dec;27(4):791-3.
8
Outcome of stapled haemorrhoidectomy versus Milligan Morgan's haemorrhoidectomy.吻合器痔切除术与Milligan Morgan痔切除术的疗效比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009 Sep;19(9):561-5.
9
Topical Diltiazem Ointment For Post- Hemorrhoidectomy Pain.痔切除术后疼痛的局部地尔硫䓬软膏治疗。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2021 Jan-Mar;33(1):125-128.
10
Randomized clinical trial comparing LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy with open diathermy haemorrhoidectomy.比较LigaSure痔切除术与开放性透热疗法痔切除术的随机临床试验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2008 Jun;12(2):93-7. doi: 10.1007/s10151-008-0405-y. Epub 2008 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
PROSPECT guideline for haemorrhoid surgery: A systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations.痔手术的PROSPECT指南:系统评价及特定手术方式的术后疼痛管理建议
Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2023 May 26;2(3):e0023. doi: 10.1097/EA9.0000000000000023. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Strategies to Reduce Post-Hemorrhoidectomy Pain: A Systematic Review.减轻痔术后疼痛的策略:系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 12;58(3):418. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030418.