Department of Rehabilitation, Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City, KS, USA.
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020 Oct;27(7):483-493. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1728953. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a promising strategy for improving gait and fitness after stroke, but optimal parameters remain unknown. We tested the effects of short vs long interval type and over-ground vs treadmill mode on training intensity. : Using a repeated measures design, 10 participants with chronic hemiparesis performed 12 HIIT sessions over 4 weeks, alternating between short and long-interval HIIT sessions. Both protocols included 10 minutes of over-ground HIIT, 20 minutes of treadmill HIIT and another 10 minutes over-ground. Short-interval HIIT involved 30 second bursts at maximum safe speed and 30-60 second rest periods. Long-interval HIIT involved 4-minute bursts at ~90% of peak heart rate (HR) and 3-minute recovery periods at ~70% HR. : Compared with long-interval HIIT, short-interval HIIT had significantly faster mean overground speeds (0.75 vs 0.67 m/s) and treadmill speeds (0.90 vs 0.51 m/s), with similar mean treadmill HR (82.9 vs 81.8%HR) and session perceived exertion (16.3 vs 16.3), but lower overground HR (78.4 vs 81.1%HR) and session step counts (1481 vs 1672). For short-interval HIIT, training speeds and HR were significantly higher on the treadmill vs. overground. For long-interval HIIT, the treadmill elicited HR similar to overground training at significantly slower speeds. : Both short and long-interval HIIT elicit high intensities but emphasize different dosing parameters. From these preliminary findings and previous studies, we hypothesize that overground and treadmill short-interval HIIT could be optimal for improving gait speed and overground long-interval HIIT could be optimal for improving gait endurance.
高强度间歇训练(HIIT)是改善中风后步态和健康的有前途的策略,但最佳参数仍不清楚。我们测试了短时间与长时间间隔类型和地面与跑步机模式对训练强度的影响。
使用重复测量设计,10 名慢性偏瘫患者在 4 周内完成了 12 次 HIIT 训练,交替进行短时间和长时间间隔 HIIT 训练。两个方案都包括 10 分钟的地面 HIIT、20 分钟的跑步机 HIIT 和另外 10 分钟的地面 HIIT。短时间间隔 HIIT 涉及以最大安全速度进行 30 秒的爆发和 30-60 秒的休息时间。长时间间隔 HIIT 涉及以约 90%的峰值心率(HR)进行 4 分钟的爆发和以约 70%的 HR 进行 3 分钟的恢复期。
与长时间间隔 HIIT 相比,短时间间隔 HIIT 的地面速度(0.75 比 0.67 米/秒)和跑步机速度(0.90 比 0.51 米/秒)明显更快,跑步机 HR(82.9 比 81.8%HR)和训练感知用力(16.3 比 16.3)相似,但地面 HR(78.4 比 81.1%HR)和训练步数(1481 比 1672)较低。对于短时间间隔 HIIT,跑步机的训练速度和 HR 明显高于地面。对于长时间间隔 HIIT,跑步机在明显较慢的速度下产生与地面训练相似的 HR。
短时间和长时间间隔 HIIT 都能产生高强度,但强调不同的剂量参数。根据这些初步发现和以前的研究,我们假设地面和跑步机短时间间隔 HIIT 可能最适合提高步速,而地面长时间间隔 HIIT 可能最适合提高步耐力。