Suppr超能文献

慢性卒中患者的体重支持跑步机训练与地面行走训练对比:一项前瞻性随机对照试验

Body weight-supported treadmill training vs. overground walking training for persons with chronic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Combs-Miller Stephanie A, Kalpathi Parameswaran Anu, Colburn Dawn, Ertel Tara, Harmeyer Amanda, Tucker Lindsay, Schmid Arlene A

机构信息

Krannert School of Physical Therapy, University of Indianapolis, IN, USA

Krannert School of Physical Therapy, University of Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2014 Sep;28(9):873-84. doi: 10.1177/0269215514520773. Epub 2014 Feb 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of body weight-supported treadmill training and overground walking training when matched for task and dose (duration/frequency/intensity) on improving walking function, activity, and participation after stroke.

DESIGN

Single-blind, pilot randomized controlled trial with three-month follow-up.

SETTINGS

University and community settings.

SUBJECTS

A convenience sample of participants (N = 20) at least six months post-stroke and able to walk independently were recruited.

INTERVENTIONS

Thirty-minute walking interventions (body weight-supported treadmill training or overground walking training) were administered five times a week for two weeks. Intensity was monitored with the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale at five-minute increments to maintain a moderate training intensity.

MAIN MEASURES

Walking speed (comfortable/fast 10-meter walk), walking endurance (6-minute walk), spatiotemporal symmetry, and the ICF Measure of Participation and ACTivity were assessed before, immediately after, and three months following the intervention.

RESULTS

The overground walking training group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in comfortable walking speed compared with the body weight-supported treadmill training group immediately (change of 0.11 m/s vs. 0.06 m/s, respectively; p = 0.047) and three months (change of 0.14 m/s vs. 0.08 m/s, respectively; p = 0.029) after training. Only the overground walking training group significantly improved comfortable walking speed (p = 0.001), aspects of gait symmetry (p = 0.032), and activity (p = 0.003) immediately after training. Gains were maintained at the three-month follow-up (p < 0.05) for all measures except activity. Improvements in participation were not demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

Overgound walking training was more beneficial than body weight-supported treadmill training at improving self-selected walking speed for the participants in this study.

摘要

目的

比较在任务和剂量(持续时间/频率/强度)相匹配的情况下,减重平板训练与地面行走训练对改善中风后步行功能、活动能力和参与度的效果。

设计

单盲、试点随机对照试验,随访三个月。

地点

大学和社区环境。

受试者

招募了中风后至少六个月且能够独立行走的方便样本参与者(N = 20)。

干预措施

进行为期两周、每周五次、每次30分钟的步行干预(减重平板训练或地面行走训练)。使用伯格主观用力程度量表每五分钟监测一次强度,以维持中等训练强度。

主要测量指标

在干预前、干预后即刻以及干预后三个月评估步行速度(舒适/快速10米步行)、步行耐力(6分钟步行)、时空对称性以及国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)参与和活动测量指标。

结果

与减重平板训练组相比,地面行走训练组在训练后即刻(分别变化0.11米/秒和0.06米/秒;p = 0.047)和三个月时(分别变化0.14米/秒和0.08米/秒;p = 0.029),舒适步行速度有显著更大的改善。仅地面行走训练组在训练后即刻舒适步行速度(p = 0.001)、步态对称性方面(p = 0.032)和活动能力(p = 0.003)有显著改善。除活动能力外,所有测量指标在三个月随访时改善情况得以维持(p < 0.05)。未显示出参与度的改善。

结论

在本研究中,对于参与者而言,地面行走训练在提高自我选择的步行速度方面比减重平板训练更有益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验