Suppr超能文献

急性脑卒中后早期认知评估:简易精神状态检查与蒙特利尔认知评估的可行性比较。

Early Cognitive Assessment Following Acute Stroke: Feasibility and Comparison between Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Neurology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Apr;29(4):104688. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104688. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Cognitive assessment is not performed routinely in the acute stroke setting. We investigated factors associated with cognitive impairment and the differences between the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores in patients with acute stroke.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 881 consecutive patients (median age, 73 years) with acute stroke were enrolled. Clinical characteristics, such as education, vascular risk factors, premorbid cognitive status using the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE), and stroke severity, were assessed. Cognitive performance was measured using MMSE and MoCA within 5 days of stroke onset.

RESULTS

Both MMSE and MoCA were feasible in 621 (70.5%) patients. Factors independently associated with nonfeasibility were age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.08), IQCODE score (OR: 1.02; 95%CI: 1.00-1.04), and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (OR, 1.16; 95%CI, 1.12-1.20). Impaired MoCA (with a cut-off <26/30) performance was observed in 544 of 621 (87.6%) patients. Factors independently associated with cognitive impairment were age (OR: 1.06; 95%CI: 1.03-1.10) and NIHSS score (OR: 1.34; 95%CI: 1.14-1.57). Eighty percent of patients with normal MMSE scores had an impaired MoCA score (MMSE-MoCA mismatch). The differences were highest in the visuospatial (94.8% versus 65.3%; P < .0001), recall (76.6% versus 35.6%; P < .0001), abstraction (82.5% versus 49.8%; P < .0001), and language (72.3% versus 65.9%; P < .0001) domains between the normal MMSE and MoCA group and MMSE-MoCA mismatch group.

CONCLUSIONS

The MoCA can be particularly useful in patients with cognitive deficits undetectable on the MMSE in the acute stroke phase.

摘要

目的

认知评估在急性脑卒中患者中并非常规进行。我们研究了与认知障碍相关的因素,以及在急性脑卒中患者中简易精神状态检查(MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评分之间的差异。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,共纳入 881 例连续急性脑卒中患者(中位年龄 73 岁)。评估了临床特征,如教育程度、血管危险因素、使用老年认知减退知情者问卷(IQCODE)评估的发病前认知状态,以及脑卒中严重程度。在脑卒中发病后 5 天内,使用 MMSE 和 MoCA 评估认知功能。

结果

621 例(70.5%)患者可行 MMSE 和 MoCA 检查。与不可行性独立相关的因素是年龄(比值比 [OR]:1.05;95%置信区间 [CI]:1.02-1.08)、IQCODE 评分(OR:1.02;95%CI:1.00-1.04)和美国国立卫生研究院脑卒中量表(NIHSS)评分(OR:1.16;95%CI:1.12-1.20)。在 621 例患者中,有 544 例(87.6%)患者 MoCA 评分受损(临界值<26/30)。与认知障碍独立相关的因素是年龄(OR:1.06;95%CI:1.03-1.10)和 NIHSS 评分(OR:1.34;95%CI:1.14-1.57)。80%的 MMSE 评分正常的患者 MoCA 评分受损(MMSE-MoCA 不匹配)。在视空间(94.8%比 65.3%;P<.0001)、回忆(76.6%比 35.6%;P<.0001)、抽象(82.5%比 49.8%;P<.0001)和语言(72.3%比 65.9%;P<.0001)领域,正常 MMSE 和 MoCA 组与 MMSE-MoCA 不匹配组之间的差异最大。

结论

MoCA 在急性脑卒中阶段,对于那些在 MMSE 上无法检测到认知缺陷的患者特别有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验