• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二类错(牙合)患者 Jasper Jumper 与 Twin Force Bite Corrector 矫治器的牙颌骨和软组织变化比较:一项回顾性研究。

Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes comparison between the Jasper Jumper and Twin Force Bite Corrector in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.

机构信息

University of São Paulo, Bauru Dental School, Department of Orthodontics, Alameda Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla 9-75, Bauru, São Paulo 17012-901, Brazil.

University of São Paulo, Bauru Dental School, Department of Orthodontics, Alameda Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla 9-75, Bauru, São Paulo 17012-901, Brazil.

出版信息

Int Orthod. 2020 Jun;18(2):286-296. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ortho.2020.01.005
PMID:32063473
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to compare the dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes in Class II malocclusion patients treated with Jasper Jumper and Twin Force Bite Corrector associated with fixed orthodontic appliances.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The sample comprised 60 subjects divided into 3 groups. Patients with Class II malocclusion, mandibular retrusion, slight or no crowding and with no previous orthodontic treatment were eligible. Group 1 comprised 20 patients treated with the Jasper Jumper (JJ), with an initial age of 12.39 years. Group 2 comprised 20 patients treated with the Twin Force (TF), with an initial age of 11.83 years. The control group consisted of 20 untreated Class II subjects with an initial age of 12.13 years. Intergroup pretreatment comparisons were performed with One-way analysis of variance and intergroup treatment changes were compared with the Analysis of Covariance, both followed by Tukey test.

RESULTS

The TF group showed greater increase in mandibular length (6.23mm±4.64, P=0.004) than the control group (2.94mm±1.75). The mandibular incisors in the experimental groups presented significantly greater labial inclination and protrusion than the control (Md1.NB; JJ: 4.19°±2.09; TF: 4.46°±6.83; control: 1.13°±2.08, P=0.000/Md1-NB; JJ: 1.95mm±1.45; TF: 1.74mm±1.79; control: 0.31mm±0.81, P=0.000). In addition, the treated groups also showed significantly improvement of the dental relationships (Overjet; JJ: -4.05mm±4.64; TF: -3.80mm±2.12; control: 0.05mm±1.12, P=0.000/Overbite; JJ: -2.52mm±1.46; TF: -2.93mm±2.13; control: -0.63mm±1.35, P=0.000).

CONCLUSION

The Jasper Jumper and Twin Force associated to fixed appliances were effective in correcting Class II malocclusion with a combination of skeletal and dentoalveolar changes. However, the TF seems to provide more skeletal effects with greater maxillary growth restriction and mandibular length increase when compared to the JJ.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究旨在比较 Jasper Jumper 和 Twin Force Bite Corrector 联合固定矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类错牙合患者的牙颌面及软组织变化。

材料和方法

该样本包括 60 名患者,分为 3 组。纳入标准为安氏Ⅱ类错牙合、下颌后缩、轻度拥挤或不拥挤且无既往正畸治疗的患者。第 1 组包括 20 名使用 Jasper Jumper(JJ)治疗的患者,初始年龄为 12.39 岁。第 2 组包括 20 名使用 Twin Force(TF)治疗的患者,初始年龄为 11.83 岁。对照组由 20 名未经治疗的安氏Ⅱ类患者组成,初始年龄为 12.13 岁。组间预处理比较采用单因素方差分析,组间治疗变化采用协方差分析,均采用 Tukey 检验。

结果

TF 组下颌长度增加(6.23mm±4.64,P=0.004)大于对照组(2.94mm±1.75)。实验组下颌切牙唇倾和突度显著大于对照组(Md1.NB;JJ:4.19°±2.09;TF:4.46°±6.83;对照组:1.13°±2.08,P=0.000/Md1-NB;JJ:1.95mm±1.45;TF:1.74mm±1.79;对照组:0.31mm±0.81,P=0.000)。此外,治疗组还明显改善了牙颌关系(覆颌;JJ:-4.05mm±4.64;TF:-3.80mm±2.12;对照组:0.05mm±1.12,P=0.000/覆盖;JJ:-2.52mm±1.46;TF:-2.93mm±2.13;对照组:-0.63mm±1.35,P=0.000)。

结论

Jasper Jumper 和 Twin Force 联合固定矫治器可有效矫正安氏Ⅱ类错牙合,同时产生骨骼和牙颌的变化。然而,与 JJ 相比,TF 似乎能提供更多的骨骼效果,同时限制上颌生长并增加下颌长度。

相似文献

1
Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes comparison between the Jasper Jumper and Twin Force Bite Corrector in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.二类错(牙合)患者 Jasper Jumper 与 Twin Force Bite Corrector 矫治器的牙颌骨和软组织变化比较:一项回顾性研究。
Int Orthod. 2020 Jun;18(2):286-296. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
2
Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.Jasper Jumper矫治器和颈带矫治器引起的牙颌面变化,随后进行固定正畸治疗。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jul;132(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.028.
3
Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.固定正畸治疗前 Jasper 跳弓和激活头帽联合矫形器对牙颌骨骼的影响
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 May;143(5):684-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.009.
4
Dentoskeletal effects produced by a Jasper Jumper with an anterior bite plane.带有前牙咬合平面的贾斯珀跳跃矫治器产生的牙骨骼效应。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Sep;86(5):775-81. doi: 10.2319/110115-737.1. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
5
Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliances.Jasper Jumper矫治器与Bionator矫治器联合固定矫治器的治疗效果。
Prog Orthod. 2014;15(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0054-9. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
6
Class II treatment effects with fixed functional appliances: Jasper jumper vs. Forsus fatigue resistant device.使用固定功能矫治器的Ⅱ类错颌治疗效果:Jasper Jumper矫治器与Forsus抗疲劳矫治器的比较
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2022 Feb;25(1):134-141. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12515. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
7
Cephalometric evaluation in different phases of Jasper jumper therapy.杰斯珀跳跃疗法不同阶段的头影测量评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Aug;140(2):e77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.03.018.
8
Comparison of the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes with the cervical headgear and Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.颈椎颅颌牵引和 Jones 矫治器联合固定矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)畸形的牙颌面及软组织变化的对比:一项回顾性研究。
Int Orthod. 2020 Sep;18(3):424-435. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
9
Effects of Class II division 1 malocclusion treatment with three types of fixed functional appliances.三种固定功能矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合的效果
Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Nov 11;24(5):30-39. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.5.030-039.oar. eCollection 2019.
10
The use of Twin Force functional fixed orthopedic appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.双力功能性固定正畸矫治器在安氏II类1分类错颌畸形治疗中的应用。
Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2014 Spring;25(1):57-60.