Suppr超能文献

丹麦急性护理医院电子处方和镇痛自我管理后的镇痛效果。

Analgesic Outcomes in a Danish Acute Care Hospital Following Electronic Prescribing and Analgesic Self-Administration.

机构信息

Centre for Quality & Patient Safety Research Epworth HealthCare Partnership, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Centre for Quality & Patient Safety Research Epworth HealthCare Partnership, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia; Surgical Department, Centre for Research and Education in Health, Regional Hospital, West Jutland, Denmark.

出版信息

Pain Manag Nurs. 2020 Aug;21(4):345-353. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.12.005. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the long-term consequences of poorly controlled postoperative pain, inadequate pain control remains a problem.

AIMS

To improve the quality of postoperative pain management, the study site, an acute care hospital in Denmark, introduced electronic prescribing with standard order-sets, and allowed patients to self-administer analgesia. This study aimed to describe analgesic prescribing, prescriptions for multimodal analgesia, analgesic administration, and patients' pain experience, in this context.

DESIGN

Point-prevalence survey.

SETTINGS

One Danish regional hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive sample of 286 surgical inpatients comprising 65 orthopaedic, 41 gynaecological, 57 urology and 123 gastrointestinal patients.

METHODS

We evaluated the quality of postoperative pain management on four postoperative surgical wards using: (1) the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire; and (2) patient chart audit.

RESULTS

Overall, 89.2% of patients were prescribed a fixed analgesic and 71.7% were prescribed fixed analgesics in multimodal combination. Patterns of multimodal prescribing and administration varied significantly across surgical groups. Patients received 87.7% of available fixed prescriptions and 22.5% of available analgesics prescribed 'as needed'. However, patients' worst pain intensity was high (mean = 5.8/10, SD = 2) and 73.4% reported moderate-to-severe worst pain during the previous 24-hours. Patients who self-administered medications used significantly more fixed-schedule paracetamol (p = .018), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (p = .001), weak (p = .035) and strong (p < .001) opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

The availability of multimodal analgesia was high following the introduction of electronic prescribing. However, gaps remain in the administration of both fixed and 'as needed' analgesics for postoperative patients. Findings suggested that allowing patients to self-administer analgesia may increase compliance with fixed schedule prescriptions.

摘要

背景

尽管术后疼痛控制不佳会带来长期后果,但疼痛控制仍然不足仍是一个问题。

目的

为了提高术后疼痛管理的质量,研究地点——丹麦的一家急症医院引入了电子处方和标准医嘱集,并允许患者自行使用镇痛药物。本研究旨在描述在此背景下的镇痛药物处方、多模式镇痛处方、镇痛药物管理以及患者的疼痛体验。

设计

时点现患调查。

地点

一家丹麦地区医院。

参与者

连续纳入 286 名外科住院患者,包括 65 例骨科、41 例妇科、57 例泌尿科和 123 例胃肠科患者。

方法

我们使用修订后的美国疼痛协会患者结局问卷和患者病历审核,评估了四个术后外科病房的术后疼痛管理质量。

结果

总体而言,89.2%的患者开具了固定剂量的镇痛药物,71.7%的患者开具了多模式联合固定剂量的镇痛药物。多模式药物处方和管理的模式在不同的手术组别之间存在显著差异。患者接受了 87.7%的可用固定处方和 22.5%的按需开具的镇痛药物。然而,患者的最痛强度仍然很高(平均=5.8/10,SD=2),73.4%的患者在过去 24 小时内报告了中度至重度最痛。自行使用药物的患者使用固定剂量扑热息痛(p=0.018)、非甾体抗炎药(p=0.001)、弱阿片类药物(p=0.035)和强阿片类药物(p<0.001)的比例显著更高。

结论

电子处方引入后,多模式镇痛的可获得性很高。然而,术后患者固定剂量和按需镇痛药物的管理仍存在差距。研究结果表明,允许患者自行使用镇痛药物可能会提高对固定剂量处方的依从性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验