Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Sciences, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Semeiotics Unit, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Hepatology. 2020 Dec;72(6):2206-2218. doi: 10.1002/hep.31187. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
Treatment allocation is extremely complex in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) because this neoplasm arises, in most cases, in patients with cirrhosis and additional comorbidities. The "stage hierarchy" approach, which involves linking each stage (or substage) of the disease to a specific treatment, has become the main proposed treatment strategy for the clinical management of HCC, particularly in the West. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) scheme serves as the main example of the application of this strategy. In an attempt to increase the plasticity of the "stage hierarchy" approach as well as its adaptability to the requirements of real-world clinical practice, the latest versions of European and American guidelines have introduced certain relevant elements of flexibility, which were not intrinsic to the original BCLC scheme. These elements are as follows: the "treatment stage migration" strategy, which allows moving to another treatment (generally the one that is associated with the subsequent stage) if the approach linked with the current stage proves to be unfeasible, and the "treatment stage alternative" approach, which proposes further therapeutic options for each BCLC-defined stage. In regard to most of the solid cancers, another potential strategy is to consider the treatment decision to be hierarchically dictated by the efficacy of each therapy with complete or partial independence from the tumor stage. This concept of "therapeutic hierarchy" has been historically endorsed by the Asia-Pacific treatment algorithm as well as by the recent Italian multisociety guidelines. The present review provides a critical analysis of the different conceptual approaches to HCC management, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages and focusing on the remarkable differences between the stage-guided and the hierarchical strategies.
肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的治疗分配极其复杂,因为这种肿瘤大多发生在肝硬化和其他合并症患者中。“分期层次”方法,即将疾病的每个阶段(或亚阶段)与特定的治疗方法联系起来,已成为 HCC 临床管理的主要治疗策略,尤其是在西方。巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)方案是该策略应用的主要范例。为了提高“分期层次”方法的灵活性及其对实际临床实践要求的适应性,最新版的欧洲和美国指南引入了一些相关的灵活性要素,这些要素不是原始 BCLC 方案所固有的。这些要素如下:“治疗阶段迁移”策略,如果与当前阶段相关的治疗方法不可行,则允许转移到另一种治疗方法(通常是与后续阶段相关的治疗方法),以及“治疗阶段替代”策略,为 BCLC 定义的每个阶段提出了进一步的治疗选择。对于大多数实体瘤,另一种潜在的策略是考虑将治疗决策根据每种治疗方法的疗效进行分层,而与肿瘤分期完全或部分独立。这种“治疗层次”的概念在历史上得到了亚太治疗算法以及最近的意大利多学会指南的认可。本综述对 HCC 管理的不同概念方法进行了批判性分析,强调了它们的优缺点,并重点关注了基于分期的策略和分层策略之间的显著差异。