• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿重症监护病房的多重耐药革兰氏阴性杆菌败血症:一项病例对照研究。

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli sepsis from a neonatal intensive care unit: a case-case-control study.

作者信息

Thatrimontrichai Anucha, Premprat Nutchana, Janjindamai Waricha, Dissaneevate Supaporn, Maneenil Gunlawadee

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.

Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.

出版信息

J Infect Dev Ctries. 2019 Jul 31;13(7):603-611. doi: 10.3855/jidc.10402.

DOI:10.3855/jidc.10402
PMID:32065817
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To identify the risks and outcomes for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (MDRGNB) sepsis in neonates.

METHODOLOGY

This was a retrospective case-case-control study between 1991 and 2016. The control group was selected from the same source records of all neonates with clinical or suspected sepsis but not culture-proven.

RESULTS

The numbers of patients in the MDRGNB sepsis, non-MDRGNB sepsis, and control groups were 157, 88, and 218, respectively. MDRGNB sepsis was significantly associated with outborn infants [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.08; p = 0.003] and infants who had a neurologic sequela (aOR 11.58; p = 0.04), lower gestational age (p = 0.03) or previous aminoglycoside use (aOR 2.43; p < 0.001) compared with the control group. Non-MDRGNB sepsis was associated with outborn infants (aOR 2.63; p < 0.001), and infants who had neurologic sequelae (aOR 48.25; p = 0.001) and previous cephalosporin use (aOR 6.28; p < 0.001) or cefoperazone plus sulbactam use (aOR 6.48; p = 0.02) compared with the control group. Case fatality (OR 3.63; p < 0.001) and septic shock (OR 12.81; p < 0.001) rates, length of stay (p < 0.001), and daily hospital costs (p = 0.01) were higher in the MDRGNB sepsis group than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Smaller preterm neonate with previous aminoglycoside use had a higher MDRGNB than non-MDRGNB sepsis compared with the control group. Intervention to reduce MDRGNB sepsis in the NICU is cost-effective.

摘要

引言

确定新生儿耐多药革兰氏阴性杆菌(MDRGNB)败血症的风险和结局。

方法

这是一项1991年至2016年的回顾性病例-病例对照研究。对照组选自所有临床诊断或疑似败血症但未经培养证实的新生儿的相同来源记录。

结果

MDRGNB败血症组、非MDRGNB败血症组和对照组的患者人数分别为157、88和218。与对照组相比,MDRGNB败血症与出生于外院的婴儿显著相关[调整优势比(aOR)2.08;p = 0.003]以及有神经后遗症的婴儿(aOR 11.58;p = 0.04)、较低的胎龄(p = 0.03)或先前使用过氨基糖苷类药物(aOR 2.43;p < 0.001)。非MDRGNB败血症与出生于外院的婴儿(aOR 2.63;p < 0.001)、有神经后遗症的婴儿(aOR 48.25;p = 0.001)以及先前使用过头孢菌素(aOR 6.28;p < 0.001)或头孢哌酮加舒巴坦(aOR 6.48;p = 0.02)的婴儿与对照组相比有关。MDRGNB败血症组的病死率(OR 3.63;p < 0.001)和感染性休克发生率(OR 12.81;p < 0.001)、住院时间(p < 0.001)和每日住院费用(p = 0.01)均高于对照组。

结论

与对照组相比,先前使用过氨基糖苷类药物的较小早产儿发生MDRGNB败血症的几率高于非MDRGNB败血症。在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)采取干预措施以减少MDRGNB败血症具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli sepsis from a neonatal intensive care unit: a case-case-control study.新生儿重症监护病房的多重耐药革兰氏阴性杆菌败血症:一项病例对照研究。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2019 Jul 31;13(7):603-611. doi: 10.3855/jidc.10402.
2
Presence, distribution and molecular epidemiology of multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli from medical personnel of intensive care units in Tianjin, China, 2007-2015.2007-2015 年中国天津重症监护病房医务人员携带的多重耐药革兰氏阴性杆菌的存在、分布和分子流行病学。
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Jun;96(2):101-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
3
Risk Factors for 30-Day Mortality in Neonatal Gram-Negative Bacilli Sepsis.新生儿革兰氏阴性杆菌败血症 30 天死亡率的危险因素。
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Jun;37(7):689-694. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688820. Epub 2019 May 14.
4
Clinical characteristics and epidemiology of sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit in the era of multi-drug resistant organisms: A retrospective review.多重耐药菌时代新生儿重症监护病房脓毒症的临床特征与流行病学:一项回顾性研究
Pediatr Neonatol. 2018 Feb;59(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
5
Extended-spectrum beta lactamase-producing gram-negative bacteria: clinical profile and outcome in a neonatal intensive care unit.产超广谱β-内酰胺酶革兰阴性菌:新生儿重症监护病房的临床特征及转归
Ann Trop Paediatr. 2007 Mar;27(1):45-54. doi: 10.1179/146532807X170501.
6
Risk for subsequent infection and mortality after hospitalization among patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria colonization or infection.耐多药革兰氏阴性菌定植或感染患者住院后的后续感染和死亡风险。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Jul 31;7:93. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0388-z. eCollection 2018.
7
Incidence, clinical features, and implications on outcomes of neonatal late-onset sepsis with concurrent infectious focus.伴有并发感染灶的新生儿晚发性败血症的发病率、临床特征及其对预后的影响。
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 3;17(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2574-7.
8
High frequency of multidrug-resistant gram-negative rods in 2 neonatal intensive care units in the Philippines.菲律宾两家新生儿重症监护病房中多重耐药革兰氏阴性杆菌的高发生率。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;30(6):543-9. doi: 10.1086/597512.
9
A decade of neonatal sepsis in Stockholm, Sweden: Gram-positive pathogens were four times as common as Gram-negatives.瑞典斯德哥尔摩新生儿败血症十年研究:革兰阳性病原体是革兰阴性病原体的四倍。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 May;43(5):959-968. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04809-8. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
10
Prevalence and risk factors for antimicrobial resistance among newborns with gram-negative sepsis.革兰氏阴性菌败血症新生儿的抗菌药物耐药率及其危险因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 3;16(8):e0255410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255410. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
The economic burden of antibiotic resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.抗生素耐药性的经济负担:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 May 8;18(5):e0285170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285170. eCollection 2023.
2
Neonatal sepsis and mortality in low-income and middle-income countries from a facility-based birth cohort: an international multisite prospective observational study.中低收入国家基于医疗机构的出生队列研究中新生儿败血症和死亡率:一项国际多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 May;10(5):e661-e672. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00043-2.