Suppr超能文献

基于基线和中期 PET 的外周 T 细胞淋巴瘤预后预测:PETAL 试验的亚组分析。

Baseline and interim PET-based outcome prediction in peripheral T-cell lymphoma: A subgroup analysis of the PETAL trial.

机构信息

Klinik für Hämatologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.

Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Hematol Oncol. 2020 Aug;38(3):244-256. doi: 10.1002/hon.2697. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

Abstract

The prospective randomized Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-Guided Therapy of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (PETAL) trial was designed to test the ability of interim PET (iPET) to direct therapy. As reported previously, outcome remained unaffected by iPET-based treatment changes. In this subgroup analysis, we studied the prognostic value of baseline total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) and iPET response in 76 patients with T-cell lymphoma. TMTV was measured using the 41% maximum standardized uptake value (SUV ) and SUV thresholding methods. Interim PET was performed after two treatment cycles and evaluated using the ΔSUV approach and the Deauville scale. Because of significant differences in outcome, patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lymphoma were analyzed separately from patients with ALK-negative lymphoma. In the latter, TMTV was statistically significantly correlated with progression-free survival, with thresholds best dichotomizing the population, of 232 cm using SUV and 460 cm using SUV . For iPET response, the respective thresholds were 46.9% SUV reduction and Deauville score 1-4 vs 5. The proportion of poor prognosis patients was 46% and 29% for TMTV by SUV and SUV , and 29% and 25% for iPET response by ΔSUV and Deauville, respectively. At diagnosis, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for poor prognosis vs good prognosis patients according to TMTV was 2.291 (1.135-4.624) for SUV and 3.206 (1.524-6.743) for SUV . At iPET, it was 3.910 (1.891-8.087) for ΔSUV and 4.371 (2.079-9.187) for Deauville. On multivariable analysis, only TMTV and iPET response independently predicted survival. Patients with high baseline TMTV and poor iPET response (22% of the population) invariably progressed or died within the first year (hazard ratio, 9.031 [3.651-22.336]). Due to small numbers and events, PET did not predict survival in ALK-positive lymphoma. Baseline TMTV and iPET response are promising tools to select patients with ALK-negative T-cell lymphoma for early allogeneic transplantation or innovative therapies.

摘要

前瞻性随机正电子发射断层扫描 (PET) 引导的侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤 (PETAL) 试验旨在测试中期 PET (iPET) 指导治疗的能力。如前所述,治疗变化后的 iPET 并未影响预后。在这项亚组分析中,我们研究了 76 例 T 细胞淋巴瘤患者基线总代谢肿瘤体积 (TMTV) 和 iPET 反应的预后价值。使用 41%最大标准化摄取值 (SUV) 和 SUV 阈值方法测量 TMTV。在两个治疗周期后进行中期 PET,并使用 ΔSUV 方法和 Deauville 评分进行评估。由于结果存在显著差异,因此将间变性淋巴瘤激酶 (ALK) 阳性淋巴瘤患者与 ALK 阴性淋巴瘤患者分别进行分析。在后一种情况下,TMTV 与无进展生存期呈统计学显著相关,使用 SUV 最佳二分法的人群阈值为 232cm,使用 SUV 的阈值为 460cm。对于 iPET 反应,相应的阈值分别为 46.9% SUV 减少和 Deauville 评分 1-4 与 5。TMTV 为 SUV 和 SUV 的不良预后患者比例分别为 46%和 29%,iPET 反应为 ΔSUV 和 Deauville 的分别为 29%和 25%。在诊断时,根据 TMTV,不良预后患者与良好预后患者的风险比 (95%置信区间) 为 SUV 为 2.291(1.135-4.624),SUV 为 3.206(1.524-6.743)。在 iPET 中,ΔSUV 为 3.910(1.891-8.087),Deauville 为 4.371(2.079-9.187)。在多变量分析中,只有 TMTV 和 iPET 反应独立预测生存。基线 TMTV 高且 iPET 反应差的患者(占人群的 22%)在第一年始终进展或死亡(风险比,9.031[3.651-22.336])。由于数量和事件较少,PET 并未预测 ALK 阳性淋巴瘤的生存。基线 TMTV 和 iPET 反应是选择 ALK 阴性 T 细胞淋巴瘤患者进行早期同种异体移植或创新疗法的有前途的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验