Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Apr;11(4):898-906. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13333. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
There are two main choices of administration route of recombinant human endostatin (Endostar) available and the treatment options of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) have changed over time. The aim of this study was to observe the long-term efficacy and safety of different administration routes of Endostar combined with CCRT.
Patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from two phase II trials were included as two cohorts. Both were treated with Endostar combined with CCRT. Endostar was administrated by intravenous injection (7.5 mg/m /day, seven days) in the IV arm and by continuous intravenous pumping (7.5 mg/m /24 hours, 120 hours) in the CIV arm.
A total of 48 patients were included in the IV arm and 67 patients in the CIV arm. The median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in the IV arm and CIV arm were 9.9 months versus 15.4 months (HR = 0.751, 95% CI 0.487-1.160, P = 0.200), 24.0 months versus 38.5 months (HR = 0.746, 95% CI 0.473-1.178, P = 0.209), 32.3 months versus 27.1 months (HR = 1.193, 95% CI 0.673-2.115, P = 0.546), 20.1 months versus 49.7 months (HR = 0.603, 95% CI 0.351-1.036, P = 0.067). The one, three, five-year PFS in the IV arm and CIV arm was 45.8% versus 52.9%, 18.3% versus 31.4%, and 18.3% versus 27.7% and the one, three, five-year OS was 81.2% versus 82.1%, 31.1% versus 50.3%, and 31.1% versus 41%, respectively. Incidence of hematological adverse reactions were numerically lower in the CIV arm than the IV arm.
Endostar delivered by CIV with CCRT may be a better option than IV in terms of potential survival and safety for unresectable stage III NSCLC.
Significant findings of the study Endostar delivered by continuous intravenous pumping might achieve more favorable survival over intravenous injection and reduce adverse hematological reactions in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with Endostar combined with CCRT.What this study adds The administration route of recombinant human endostatin is also one key factor for survival and safety to consider when treating patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.
重组人血管内皮抑制素(恩度)有两种主要的给药途径,同时,同期放化疗(CCRT)的治疗选择随着时间的推移而发生变化。本研究旨在观察不同给药途径的恩度联合 CCRT 的长期疗效和安全性。
将来自两项 II 期试验的不能切除的 III 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者纳入两个队列。两组患者均接受恩度联合 CCRT 治疗。IV 组采用静脉注射(7.5mg/m/天,7 天),CIV 组采用持续静脉泵注(7.5mg/m/24 小时,120 小时)。
IV 组纳入 48 例患者,CIV 组纳入 67 例患者。IV 组和 CIV 组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、局部无复发生存期(LRFS)和远处无转移生存期(DMFS)分别为 9.9 个月对比 15.4 个月(HR=0.751,95%CI 0.487-1.160,P=0.200)、24.0 个月对比 38.5 个月(HR=0.746,95%CI 0.473-1.178,P=0.209)、32.3 个月对比 27.1 个月(HR=1.193,95%CI 0.673-2.115,P=0.546)、20.1 个月对比 49.7 个月(HR=0.603,95%CI 0.351-1.036,P=0.067)。IV 组和 CIV 组的 1、3、5 年 PFS 分别为 45.8%对比 52.9%、18.3%对比 31.4%、18.3%对比 27.7%,1、3、5 年 OS 分别为 81.2%对比 82.1%、31.1%对比 50.3%、31.1%对比 41%。CIV 组的血液学不良反应发生率略低于 IV 组。
对于不能切除的 III 期 NSCLC 患者,与 IV 相比,CIV 联合 CCRT 给予恩度可能在生存和安全性方面具有更好的效果。
研究的重要发现:在接受恩度联合 CCRT 治疗的不能切除的 III 期 NSCLC 患者中,持续静脉泵注恩度可能比静脉注射获得更有利的生存,且降低血液学不良反应。
重组人血管内皮抑制素的给药途径也是影响不能切除的 III 期 NSCLC 患者生存和安全性的关键因素之一。