Department of Psychological Science, University of North Georgia, Gainesville, Georgia, USA.
J Homosex. 2021 Oct 15;68(12):2047-2074. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2020.1717839. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
This study examined whether defendants' gender identity and/or sexual orientation influenced jurors' decisions of guilt across several crimes and what juror attitudes predicted these decisions. In a mixed model design, mock jurors ( = 300) were randomly presented three crime vignettes (prostitution, vandalism, marijuana possession) and three types of defendants (cisgender heterosexual female, cisgender gay male, transgender heterosexual female). After making judgments of guilt, participants completed measures on sexism, homonegativity, transphobia, and trust in legal authorities. Jurors were more likely to believe transgender heterosexual females were guilty when compared to cisgender heterosexual females, but were not more likely to believe cisgender gay males were guilty compared to cisgender heterosexual females. Transphobia had a small association with these decisions and was not a stronger predictor for transgender defendants' guilt than for all defendants. Rather, trust in legal authorities was more strongly associated with the guilt decisions than transphobia for all defendants.
本研究考察了被告的性别认同和/或性取向是否会影响陪审员对多项罪行的有罪判决,以及哪些陪审员态度可以预测这些判决。在混合模型设计中,模拟陪审员(n=300)随机呈现了三个犯罪情节(卖淫、故意破坏财物、持有大麻)和三种类型的被告(顺性别异性恋女性、顺性别同性恋男性、跨性别异性恋女性)。在做出有罪判决后,参与者完成了关于性别歧视、同性恋憎恶、跨性别恐惧症以及对法律权威的信任的测量。与顺性别异性恋女性相比,陪审员更有可能认为跨性别异性恋女性有罪,但与顺性别异性恋女性相比,他们不太可能认为顺性别同性恋男性有罪。跨性别恐惧症与这些判决有一定的关联,但对于跨性别被告的有罪判决的预测力不如对所有被告的预测力强。相反,对于所有被告来说,对法律权威的信任与有罪判决的关联比跨性别恐惧症更强。